Is Lovell a boy or girl name?
Lovell is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 22 boys were named Lovell, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 15.7% of the 4,030 US babies named Lovell were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,634
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lovell since 1886
- 4,030
- Most popular year
- 1916
- 63 babies
Boys and girls named Lovell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 22 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 47 | 15 | 24.2% |
| 1910s | 280 | 119 | 29.8% |
| 1920s | 372 | 167 | 31% |
| 1930s | 352 | 134 | 27.6% |
| 1940s | 367 | 83 | 18.4% |
| 1950s | 374 | 52 | 12.2% |
| 1960s | 309 | 22 | 6.6% |
| 1970s | 315 | 12 | 3.7% |
| 1980s | 231 | 6 | 2.5% |
| 1990s | 253 | 5 | 1.9% |
| 2000s | 187 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 178 | 5 | 2.7% |
| 2020s | 105 | 12 | 10.3% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | #4,634 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 13 | #6,749 | 6 | #14,446 |
| 2022 | 25 | #4,243 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 20 | #4,867 | 6 | #14,534 |
| 2020 | 25 | #4,097 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 15 | #5,994 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 18 | #5,231 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #5,960 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 16 | #5,687 | 5 | #17,798 |
| 2015 | 14 | #6,167 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 21 | #4,635 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 24 | #4,137 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 15 | #5,879 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 17 | #5,343 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 23 | #4,316 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 16 | #5,720 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 14 | #6,280 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 23 | #4,312 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 26 | #3,855 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 13 | #6,086 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 19 | #4,523 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 19 | #4,362 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 18 | #4,427 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 15 | #5,051 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 24 | #3,488 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 20 | #3,783 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,797 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 20 | #3,541 | 5 | #15,127 |
| 1996 | 26 | #2,882 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 24 | #2,987 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 31 | #2,475 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 25 | #2,837 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 33 | #2,280 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 26 | #2,655 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 29 | #2,410 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 25 | #2,583 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 21 | #2,738 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 37 | #1,777 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 17 | #2,958 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 19 | #2,662 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 29 | #1,919 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 22 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 21 | #2,390 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 20 | #2,462 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 20 | #2,495 | 6 | #9,790 |
| 1979 | 39 | #1,521 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 34 | #1,637 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 34 | #1,628 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 30 | #1,729 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 20 | #2,260 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 41 | #1,345 | 5 | #9,581 |
| 1973 | 24 | #1,855 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 24 | #1,856 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 29 | #1,654 | 7 | #7,032 |
| 1970 | 40 | #1,327 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 37 | #1,311 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 34 | #1,332 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 32 | #1,353 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 28 | #1,472 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 30 | #1,421 | 8 | #5,099 |
| 1964 | 32 | #1,398 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 22 | #1,725 | 5 | #7,199 |
| 1962 | 35 | #1,328 | 9 | #4,731 |
| 1961 | 25 | #1,623 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 34 | #1,376 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 38 | #1,274 | 6 | #5,954 |
| 1958 | 45 | #1,156 | 5 | #6,634 |
| 1957 | 24 | #1,659 | 7 | #5,175 |
| 1956 | 44 | #1,153 | 7 | #5,101 |
| 1955 | 42 | #1,158 | 5 | #6,353 |
| 1954 | 35 | #1,288 | 5 | #6,250 |
| 1953 | 43 | #1,132 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 44 | #1,103 | 6 | #5,267 |
| 1951 | 27 | #1,444 | 5 | #5,867 |
| 1950 | 32 | #1,281 | 6 | #5,051 |
| 1949 | 46 | #1,043 | 5 | #5,691 |
| 1948 | 41 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 38 | #1,182 | 15 | #2,708 |
| 1946 | 41 | #1,087 | 10 | #3,347 |
| 1945 | 30 | #1,217 | 9 | #3,288 |
| 1944 | 41 | #1,029 | 11 | #2,869 |
| 1943 | 32 | #1,235 | 7 | #4,032 |
| 1942 | 24 | #1,447 | 7 | #3,961 |
| 1941 | 36 | #1,100 | 10 | #2,959 |
| 1940 | 38 | #1,058 | 9 | #3,108 |
| 1939 | 31 | #1,183 | 12 | #2,513 |
| 1938 | 34 | #1,121 | 14 | #2,288 |
| 1937 | 43 | #965 | 11 | #2,655 |
| 1936 | 36 | #1,082 | 11 | #2,621 |
| 1935 | 34 | #1,137 | 16 | #2,059 |
| 1934 | 30 | #1,231 | 12 | #2,512 |
| 1933 | 44 | #956 | 18 | #1,884 |
| 1932 | 36 | #1,133 | 16 | #2,094 |
| 1931 | 36 | #1,141 | 14 | #2,262 |
| 1930 | 28 | #1,384 | 10 | #2,974 |
| 1929 | 40 | #1,103 | 15 | #2,258 |
| 1928 | 36 | #1,204 | 12 | #2,704 |
| 1927 | 37 | #1,191 | 14 | #2,494 |
| 1926 | 34 | #1,255 | 20 | #1,965 |
| 1925 | 36 | #1,194 | 13 | #2,711 |
| 1924 | 35 | #1,237 | 24 | #1,790 |
| 1923 | 35 | #1,230 | 22 | #1,875 |
| 1922 | 46 | #1,044 | 13 | #2,695 |
| 1921 | 40 | #1,134 | 23 | #1,843 |
| 1920 | 33 | #1,268 | 11 | #3,015 |
| 1919 | 45 | #1,016 | 12 | #2,745 |
| 1918 | 42 | #1,051 | 10 | #3,153 |
| 1917 | 25 | #1,419 | 18 | #1,967 |
| 1916 | 46 | #946 | 17 | #1,995 |
| 1915 | 29 | #1,233 | 13 | #2,327 |
| 1914 | 32 | #994 | 13 | #1,967 |
| 1913 | 21 | #1,134 | 8 | #2,454 |
| 1912 | 17 | #1,159 | 13 | #1,581 |
| 1911 | 15 | #880 | 9 | #1,732 |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,270 | 6 | #2,301 |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,604 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,307 |
| 1907 | 7 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,177 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 7 | #975 | 5 | #1,953 |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 5 | #1,150 | 5 | #1,830 |
| 1900 | 7 | #1,125 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 6 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 6 | #919 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lovell reached #880 in 1911. As a girl name, it reached #1,581 in 1912. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lovell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.