Is Haskell a boy or girl name?
Haskell was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 3,710 US babies named Haskell were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #9,283
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Haskell since 1883
- 3,710
- Most popular year
- 1919
- 104 babies
Boys and girls named Haskell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 12 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 53 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 142 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 672 | 5 | 0.7% |
| 1920s | 862 | 5 | 0.6% |
| 1930s | 652 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 465 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 308 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 192 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 117 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 57 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 36 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 23 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 69 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 40 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 | #9,283 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 6 | #11,326 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 10 | #7,964 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 7 | #10,098 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 9 | #8,295 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 10 | #7,843 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 5 | #12,855 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 6 | #11,259 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 9 | #8,382 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 7 | #9,934 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 10 | #7,758 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 6 | #11,228 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,296 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 5 | #12,995 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 5 | #12,946 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 5 | #13,246 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 7 | #9,944 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 6 | #10,574 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 5 | #11,194 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 6 | #8,885 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,541 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 5 | #9,366 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 5 | #8,923 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 7 | #6,804 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 8 | #6,044 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 10 | #4,251 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 6 | #6,063 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 11 | #3,718 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 7 | #5,240 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 12 | #3,492 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 11 | #3,710 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 12 | #3,433 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 14 | #2,975 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 12 | #3,277 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 9 | #3,833 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 13 | #2,970 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 14 | #2,720 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,096 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 10 | #3,231 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 9 | #3,477 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 13 | #2,671 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 14 | #2,353 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 13 | #2,376 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 7 | #3,373 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 25 | #1,553 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 23 | #1,643 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 19 | #1,868 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 21 | #1,765 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 24 | #1,640 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 19 | #1,905 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 27 | #1,566 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 20 | #1,832 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 24 | #1,612 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 25 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 34 | #1,323 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 28 | #1,470 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 34 | #1,300 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 36 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 33 | #1,306 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 41 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 33 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 41 | #1,101 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 36 | #1,204 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 48 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 39 | #1,118 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 40 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 44 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 57 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 62 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 40 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 58 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 51 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 52 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 61 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 73 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 58 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 59 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 60 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 73 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 78 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 87 | #669 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 76 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 77 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 76 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 84 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 90 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 94 | #668 | 5 | #5,410 |
| 1923 | 100 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 97 | #651 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 89 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 79 | #733 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 104 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 86 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 83 | #657 | 5 | #4,906 |
| 1916 | 92 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 80 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 60 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 67 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 48 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 22 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 30 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 22 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 31 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 24 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 20 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 7 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 8 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 9 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 6 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 6 | #1,231 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,117 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 6 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 7 | #888 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 7 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 6 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 7 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 7 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 8 | #731 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #961 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Haskell reached #432 in 1908. As a girl name, it reached #4,906 in 1917. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Haskell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.