Is Ennis a boy or girl name?
Ennis is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 15 boys were named Ennis, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 9.1% of the 3,516 US babies named Ennis were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,970
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ennis since 1880
- 3,516
- Most popular year
- 1918
- 70 babies
Boys and girls named Ennis, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 62 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 76 | 11 | 12.6% |
| 1900s | 111 | 29 | 20.7% |
| 1910s | 391 | 101 | 20.5% |
| 1920s | 481 | 72 | 13% |
| 1930s | 396 | 54 | 12% |
| 1940s | 368 | 25 | 6.4% |
| 1950s | 335 | 23 | 6.4% |
| 1960s | 239 | 5 | 2% |
| 1970s | 236 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 122 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 129 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 103 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 85 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 62 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15 | #5,970 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 15 | #6,014 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 11 | #7,406 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 12 | #6,822 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 9 | #8,258 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 5 | #12,719 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 13 | #6,449 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #5,878 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 12 | #6,846 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 7 | #9,862 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 8 | #9,026 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 9 | #8,315 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 9 | #8,360 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 7 | #9,949 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 14 | #6,195 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 9 | #8,506 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 11 | #7,243 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 11 | #7,072 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 10 | #7,278 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 7 | #9,220 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 7 | #8,953 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 6 | #9,746 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 13 | #5,466 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 15 | #4,863 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 19 | #3,884 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 13 | #4,964 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 36 | #2,324 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,448 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 16 | #3,924 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 12 | #4,800 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 9 | #5,785 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 5 | #8,607 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 14 | #4,038 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 11 | #4,606 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 10 | #4,539 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 12 | #3,800 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 12 | #3,709 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 10 | #4,140 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 9 | #4,304 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 8 | #4,629 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,350 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 21 | #2,366 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 16 | #2,865 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 23 | #2,183 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 21 | #2,232 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 24 | #2,026 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 28 | #1,796 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 17 | #2,478 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 19 | #2,216 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 26 | #1,746 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 28 | #1,661 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 20 | #2,076 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 30 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 41 | #1,237 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 20 | #1,801 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 19 | #1,827 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 16 | #1,988 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 17 | #1,946 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 20 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 21 | #1,754 | 5 | #6,900 |
| 1962 | 23 | #1,681 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 34 | #1,373 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 28 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 27 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 20 | #1,786 | 7 | #5,049 |
| 1957 | 35 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 35 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 35 | #1,278 | 5 | #6,118 |
| 1954 | 30 | #1,389 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 44 | #1,111 | 5 | #5,930 |
| 1952 | 43 | #1,123 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 32 | #1,313 | 6 | #5,013 |
| 1950 | 34 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 35 | #1,212 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 35 | #1,221 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 32 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 45 | #1,024 | 9 | #3,481 |
| 1945 | 33 | #1,146 | 6 | #4,177 |
| 1944 | 33 | #1,161 | 5 | #4,776 |
| 1943 | 49 | #964 | 5 | #4,881 |
| 1942 | 35 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 34 | #1,136 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 37 | #1,075 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 45 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 46 | #931 | 5 | #4,532 |
| 1937 | 33 | #1,153 | 6 | #3,940 |
| 1936 | 34 | #1,125 | 8 | #3,194 |
| 1935 | 34 | #1,130 | 13 | #2,343 |
| 1934 | 46 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 38 | #1,057 | 6 | #3,884 |
| 1932 | 43 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 37 | #1,114 | 9 | #3,047 |
| 1930 | 40 | #1,094 | 7 | #3,776 |
| 1929 | 51 | #945 | 8 | #3,485 |
| 1928 | 42 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 51 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 45 | #1,039 | 6 | #4,472 |
| 1925 | 42 | #1,079 | 13 | #2,662 |
| 1924 | 39 | #1,160 | 8 | #3,766 |
| 1923 | 53 | #942 | 8 | #3,743 |
| 1922 | 62 | #874 | 6 | #4,619 |
| 1921 | 43 | #1,074 | 12 | #2,829 |
| 1920 | 53 | #950 | 11 | #2,972 |
| 1919 | 50 | #951 | 12 | #2,698 |
| 1918 | 53 | #910 | 17 | #2,136 |
| 1917 | 44 | #985 | 13 | #2,461 |
| 1916 | 48 | #919 | 19 | #1,824 |
| 1915 | 52 | #859 | 9 | #2,972 |
| 1914 | 41 | #841 | 10 | #2,313 |
| 1913 | 31 | #881 | 7 | #2,623 |
| 1912 | 32 | #769 | 6 | #2,734 |
| 1911 | 16 | #838 | 8 | #1,836 |
| 1910 | 24 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 17 | #661 | 11 | #1,314 |
| 1908 | 14 | #721 | 5 | #2,208 |
| 1907 | 14 | #714 | 7 | #1,692 |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 10 | #776 | 6 | #1,725 |
| 1903 | 9 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 10 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 12 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 18 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 7 | #884 | 5 | #1,679 |
| 1898 | 9 | #768 | 6 | #1,571 |
| 1897 | 11 | #661 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 10 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 8 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 11 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 8 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 8 | #739 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 10 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 10 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 9 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 8 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #809 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 5 | #954 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ennis reached #586 in 1910. As a girl name, it reached #1,314 in 1909. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.