Is Eloisa a boy or girl name?
Eloisa is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 128 girls and 0 boys were named Eloisa, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 6,901 US babies named Eloisa were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,619
- Babies named Eloisa since 1886
- 6,901
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 128 babies
Boys and girls named Eloisa, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 90 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 169 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 490 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 882 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 632 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 568 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 459 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 456 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 550 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 536 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 597 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 420 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 523 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 511 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,619 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,858 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,009 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,930 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,325 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,660 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,883 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,609 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,573 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,975 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,506 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,374 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,872 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,681 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,640 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,601 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,730 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,499 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,276 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,942 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,118 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,548 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,163 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,156 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,132 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,949 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,581 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,458 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,380 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,350 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,511 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,133 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,805 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,080 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,851 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,926 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,163 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,403 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,082 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,231 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,870 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,919 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,156 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,870 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,814 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,753 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,709 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,864 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,753 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,691 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,078 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,670 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,490 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,646 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,808 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,791 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,921 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,686 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,930 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,602 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,672 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,724 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,834 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,524 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,546 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,891 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,796 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,535 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,330 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,410 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,449 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,591 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,342 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,277 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,585 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,309 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,129 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,162 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,152 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 65 | #958 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,130 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 83 | #857 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,143 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 63 | #928 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,277 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 57 | #931 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 58 | #933 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 57 | #914 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 80 | #749 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 58 | #905 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 69 | #811 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 60 | #869 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 59 | #917 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 55 | #933 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 79 | #796 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 83 | #769 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 82 | #793 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 87 | #778 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 100 | #727 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 72 | #874 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 101 | #734 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 78 | #830 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 100 | #727 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 88 | #780 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 91 | #762 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 100 | #700 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 73 | #845 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 78 | #785 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,069 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 51 | #928 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 41 | #923 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 34 | #916 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 33 | #877 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,259 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 23 | #899 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 20 | #916 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 25 | #776 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,001 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 20 | #820 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 17 | #905 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 23 | #734 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,359 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,156 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 12 | #970 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 19 | #867 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 14 | #890 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,122 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,298 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,067 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,006 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,167 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,037 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #976 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 11 | #855 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,339 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 7 | #974 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,013 |
Highest rank
Eloisa has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #700 in 1919. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eloisa
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.