Is Elois a boy or girl name?
Elois was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.6% of the 2,652 US babies named Elois were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Elois since 1895
- 2,652
- Most popular year
- 1927
- 79 babies
Boys and girls named Elois, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 280 | 100% |
| 1920s | 10 | 622 | 98.4% |
| 1930s | 0 | 637 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 536 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 390 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 135 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,448 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,161 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,869 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,392 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,797 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,019 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,146 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,899 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,073 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,424 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,260 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,416 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,951 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,083 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,878 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,558 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,471 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,362 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,458 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,343 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,435 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,193 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,107 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,230 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,117 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,101 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,157 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,259 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 65 | #973 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,007 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,088 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,000 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 62 | #900 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 58 | #906 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 61 | #870 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 75 | #781 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 56 | #920 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 67 | #816 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 68 | #833 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 70 | #812 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 70 | #857 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 66 | #882 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 63 | #937 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,378 | 74 | #857 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 59 | #972 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 65 | #925 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 71 | #896 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,020 |
| 1922 | 5 | #4,496 | 49 | #1,094 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 65 | #921 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 55 | #994 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 55 | #957 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,067 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,132 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,135 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,296 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,618 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,545 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,187 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,833 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,669 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,308 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,895 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,037 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,027 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,972 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,670 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Elois reached #4,378 in 1927. As a girl name, it reached #781 in 1935. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Elois
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.