Is Rexford a boy or girl name?
Rexford is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 19 boys were named Rexford, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,625 US babies named Rexford were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,187
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rexford since 1891
- 2,625
- Most popular year
- 1925
- 53 babies
Boys and girls named Rexford, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 43 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 330 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 378 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 315 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 318 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 321 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 192 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 115 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 102 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 79 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 99 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | #5,187 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 16 | #5,864 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 18 | #5,385 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 21 | #4,741 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 25 | #4,119 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 23 | #4,444 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 19 | #5,067 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 13 | #6,592 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 10 | #8,038 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 16 | #5,683 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 17 | #5,435 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 15 | #5,860 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 9 | #8,725 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 10 | #7,948 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 16 | #5,680 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,587 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 12 | #7,101 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 10 | #8,044 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 8 | #9,376 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 9 | #8,160 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 7 | #9,722 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 6 | #10,580 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 8 | #8,277 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 8 | #8,042 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 11 | #5,962 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 9 | #6,723 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 11 | #5,457 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 11 | #5,427 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 9 | #6,243 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 18 | #3,619 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 12 | #4,801 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 9 | #5,838 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 12 | #4,617 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 9 | #5,500 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 16 | #3,316 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 8 | #5,343 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 15 | #3,237 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 14 | #3,352 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 12 | #3,635 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 12 | #3,576 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 9 | #4,508 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 12 | #3,571 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 8 | #4,850 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 11 | #3,763 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 8 | #4,473 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 17 | #2,636 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 6 | #5,462 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 19 | #2,344 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 15 | #2,647 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,169 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 19 | #2,142 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 22 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 20 | #2,045 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 21 | #1,849 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 21 | #1,772 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 24 | #1,601 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 12 | #2,433 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 16 | #2,057 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 18 | #1,960 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 18 | #1,946 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 21 | #1,796 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 20 | #1,863 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 21 | #1,806 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 18 | #1,959 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 22 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 27 | #1,540 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 32 | #1,377 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 35 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 33 | #1,327 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 40 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 34 | #1,291 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 49 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 31 | #1,311 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 17 | #1,866 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 38 | #1,170 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 39 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 33 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 35 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 37 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 27 | #1,357 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 35 | #1,188 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 24 | #1,404 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 33 | #1,176 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 32 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 27 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 30 | #1,226 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 42 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 44 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 29 | #1,265 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 38 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 24 | #1,458 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 17 | #1,827 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 32 | #1,273 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 31 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 22 | #1,636 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 36 | #1,221 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 30 | #1,349 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 53 | #930 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 32 | #1,322 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 49 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 47 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 47 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 31 | #1,315 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 52 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 46 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 46 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 41 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 50 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 34 | #962 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 29 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 19 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 6 | #1,702 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 7 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 10 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,224 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,366 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,113 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,033 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 5 | #1,465 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 6 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 8 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 7 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #939 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rexford reached #840 in 1897. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rexford
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.