Is Reatha a boy or girl name?
Reatha was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,624 US babies named Reatha were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Reatha since 1893
- 2,624
- Most popular year
- 1927
- 72 babies
Boys and girls named Reatha, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 23 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 376 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 587 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 441 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 422 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 394 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 184 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 51 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,205 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,345 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,826 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,876 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,188 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,818 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,410 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,403 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,887 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,992 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,364 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,701 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,440 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,411 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,594 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,981 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,296 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,892 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,457 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,943 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,141 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,784 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,018 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,628 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,766 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,792 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,468 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,364 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,335 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,489 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,318 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,367 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,299 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,434 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,129 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,185 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,339 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,435 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,114 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,436 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,145 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,086 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,060 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,033 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,053 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,096 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,218 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,040 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,055 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,039 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,076 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,067 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 72 | #882 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 71 | #886 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 60 | #967 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,026 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,051 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,017 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,042 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 69 | #878 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,118 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,054 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 52 | #972 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,054 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 49 | #954 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 42 | #916 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 33 | #940 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,339 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 22 | #952 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 25 | #874 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 18 | #988 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,076 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 17 | #941 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,399 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,002 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,233 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,124 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,124 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,632 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 19 | #880 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,016 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,361 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,614 |
Highest rank
Reatha has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #874 in 1910. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Reatha
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.