Is Gennie a boy or girl name?
Gennie was mostly a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 92.7% of the 2,740 US babies named Gennie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Gennie since 1884
- 2,740
- Most popular year
- 1928
- 55 babies
Boys and girls named Gennie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 27 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 88 | 100% |
| 1900s | 10 | 135 | 93.1% |
| 1910s | 44 | 301 | 87.2% |
| 1920s | 57 | 425 | 88.2% |
| 1930s | 46 | 330 | 87.8% |
| 1940s | 26 | 368 | 93.4% |
| 1950s | 11 | 308 | 96.6% |
| 1960s | 5 | 203 | 97.6% |
| 1970s | 0 | 156 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 139 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 56 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,326 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,246 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,628 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,053 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,195 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,285 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,652 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,594 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,131 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 10 | #7,315 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,464 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,850 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,153 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,644 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,535 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,578 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,464 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,205 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,871 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,679 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,737 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,854 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,825 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,918 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,993 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,768 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,087 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,583 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,944 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,672 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,910 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,788 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,187 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,369 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,997 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,224 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,315 |
| 1960 | 5 | #4,249 | 19 | #2,842 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,957 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,279 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,372 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,487 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,036 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,806 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,428 |
| 1952 | 6 | #3,505 | 33 | #1,722 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,488 |
| 1950 | 5 | #3,879 | 25 | #1,928 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,745 |
| 1948 | 5 | #3,872 | 46 | #1,365 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,587 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,570 |
| 1945 | 7 | #2,845 | 42 | #1,238 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,412 |
| 1943 | 9 | #2,625 | 25 | #1,718 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,256 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,124 |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,641 | 39 | #1,177 |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,678 | 26 | #1,489 |
| 1938 | 9 | #2,546 | 40 | #1,149 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,206 |
| 1936 | 8 | #2,722 | 35 | #1,213 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,282 |
| 1934 | 6 | #3,436 | 30 | #1,329 |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,108 | 35 | #1,210 |
| 1932 | 5 | #3,973 | 26 | #1,499 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,132 |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,745 | 30 | #1,414 |
| 1929 | 7 | #3,362 | 39 | #1,201 |
| 1928 | 5 | #4,372 | 50 | #1,063 |
| 1927 | 9 | #2,994 | 38 | #1,287 |
| 1926 | 5 | #4,450 | 44 | #1,153 |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,478 | 46 | #1,142 |
| 1924 | 13 | #2,396 | 41 | #1,250 |
| 1923 | 8 | #3,273 | 43 | #1,185 |
| 1922 | 5 | #4,554 | 41 | #1,213 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,156 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,235 |
| 1919 | 7 | #3,545 | 45 | #1,097 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,207 |
| 1917 | 8 | #3,039 | 37 | #1,192 |
| 1916 | 11 | #2,441 | 33 | #1,256 |
| 1915 | 6 | #3,567 | 35 | #1,156 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,277 |
| 1913 | 6 | #2,612 | 24 | #1,130 |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,382 | 22 | #1,128 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 22 | #941 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 20 | #984 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 20 | #920 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 20 | #895 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 18 | #902 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 16 | #933 |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,308 | 9 | #1,348 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,124 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,159 |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,202 | 9 | #1,255 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,094 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,131 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,136 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 13 | #979 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,638 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,343 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 12 | #956 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,094 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 11 | #920 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,121 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,398 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #969 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,356 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,189 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 7 | #933 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 9 | #757 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Gennie reached #1,202 in 1902. As a girl name, it reached #757 in 1884. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Gennie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.