Is Emelie a boy or girl name?
Emelie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 31 girls and 0 boys were named Emelie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,587 US babies named Emelie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,483
- Babies named Emelie since 1880
- 2,587
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 76 babies
Boys and girls named Emelie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 80 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 79 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 71 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 101 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 109 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 52 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 40 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 120 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 331 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 585 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 516 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 174 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,483 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,130 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,065 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,184 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,239 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,348 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,974 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,941 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,876 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,868 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,151 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,946 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,070 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,148 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,847 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,904 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,090 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,868 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,064 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,680 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,431 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 76 | #2,245 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,531 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,212 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,471 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,010 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,859 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,738 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,452 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,111 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,250 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,172 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,704 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,856 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,564 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,723 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 10 | #7,292 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,688 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,811 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,126 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,542 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,875 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,220 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,955 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,432 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,869 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,074 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,767 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,449 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,653 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,104 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,552 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,967 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,162 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,811 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,894 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,078 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,039 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,552 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,276 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,976 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,493 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,334 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,226 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,789 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,434 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,200 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,801 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,595 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,177 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,543 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,101 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,050 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,903 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,132 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,148 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,047 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,464 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,354 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,623 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,248 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,410 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,910 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,480 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,262 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,452 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,671 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,529 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,017 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,628 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,833 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,147 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,098 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,558 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,568 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,733 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,101 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,294 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,046 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,337 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,212 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,028 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,507 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,207 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,900 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,040 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,771 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,066 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,660 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,657 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,255 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,481 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,784 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,057 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,334 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,007 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,169 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,116 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,110 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,034 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 14 | #734 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 12 | #766 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,182 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 15 | #580 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 7 | #865 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 7 | #874 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 6 | #850 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 11 | #576 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 6 | #766 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 10 | #556 |
Highest rank
Emelie has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #556 in 1880. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Emelie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.