Is Emelia a boy or girl name?
Emelia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 527 girls and 0 boys were named Emelia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 13,537 US babies named Emelia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #573
- Babies named Emelia since 1880
- 13,537
- Most popular year
- 2019
- 701 babies
Boys and girls named Emelia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 201 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 273 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 229 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 409 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 445 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 224 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 194 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 189 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 134 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 126 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 310 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 699 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,077 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 4,988 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 3,039 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 527 | #573 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 569 | #533 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 598 | #520 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 662 | #471 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 683 | #452 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 701 | #443 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 654 | #481 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 575 | #540 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 532 | #583 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 509 | #591 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 463 | #619 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 438 | #645 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 411 | #686 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 366 | #752 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 339 | #805 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 316 | #873 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 282 | #956 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 222 | #1,155 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 247 | #1,038 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 210 | #1,123 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 220 | #1,051 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 189 | #1,146 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 162 | #1,238 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,602 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,560 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,814 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,753 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,870 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,868 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,990 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,195 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,158 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,301 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,142 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,353 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,678 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,712 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,677 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,480 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,347 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,005 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,083 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,811 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,366 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,434 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,475 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,006 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,482 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,970 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,943 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,807 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,429 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,943 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,898 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,540 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,161 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,850 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,721 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,993 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,603 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,031 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,223 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,075 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,503 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,556 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,491 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,788 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,236 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,092 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,573 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,927 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,453 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,038 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,511 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,017 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,293 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,907 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,671 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,111 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,950 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,930 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,016 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,925 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,902 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,910 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,232 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,453 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,805 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,818 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,565 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,856 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,376 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,775 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,043 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,166 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,199 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,558 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,243 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,366 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,106 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,064 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,162 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,025 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 58 | #973 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,091 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,110 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 57 | #950 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 54 | #948 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 48 | #999 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 52 | #920 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 41 | #924 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 36 | #885 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,011 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 21 | #963 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 30 | #784 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 22 | #875 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 28 | #731 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 16 | #958 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 31 | #653 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 17 | #906 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 16 | #916 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 22 | #717 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 25 | #675 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 27 | #604 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 25 | #731 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 28 | #581 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 26 | #638 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 22 | #665 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 24 | #642 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 27 | #579 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 26 | #577 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 33 | #468 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 22 | #599 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 31 | #462 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 34 | #435 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 13 | #732 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 33 | #435 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 27 | #426 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 19 | #512 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 29 | #383 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 12 | #619 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 29 | #333 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 17 | #450 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 10 | #551 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 12 | #503 |
Highest rank
Emelia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #333 in 1883. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Emelia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.