Is Eulalia a boy or girl name?
Eulalia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 64 girls and 0 boys were named Eulalia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,797 US babies named Eulalia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,693
- Babies named Eulalia since 1880
- 4,797
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 108 babies
Boys and girls named Eulalia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 291 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 275 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 693 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 854 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 523 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 301 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 240 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 193 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 170 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 133 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 179 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 243 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 336 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 283 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,693 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,109 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,801 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,261 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,900 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,810 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,179 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,715 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,732 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,793 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,068 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,881 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,145 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,425 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,843 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,129 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,932 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,854 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,864 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,087 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,883 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,653 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,808 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,066 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,549 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,088 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,157 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,086 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,848 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,765 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,314 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,376 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,999 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,039 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,743 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,115 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,707 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,693 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,297 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,147 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,442 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,508 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,051 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,798 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,199 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,575 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,320 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,284 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,436 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,314 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,812 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,673 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,603 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,629 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,628 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,030 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,084 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,530 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,080 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,456 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,617 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,902 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,962 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,261 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,162 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,164 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,344 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,512 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,483 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,013 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,470 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,042 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,949 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,715 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,877 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,607 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,147 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,013 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,517 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,603 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,714 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,633 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,423 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,251 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,156 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,695 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 53 | #979 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,262 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,120 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,060 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,021 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 57 | #899 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 75 | #784 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 74 | #788 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 81 | #783 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 67 | #869 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 58 | #975 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 84 | #794 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 81 | #809 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 94 | #765 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 77 | #853 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 83 | #797 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 99 | #731 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 108 | #710 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 103 | #716 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 100 | #701 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 82 | #788 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 82 | #764 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 97 | #696 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 81 | #739 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 69 | #694 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 58 | #681 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 44 | #758 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 42 | #669 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 38 | #693 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 38 | #640 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 29 | #724 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 33 | #657 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 30 | #667 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 24 | #744 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 31 | #618 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 29 | #612 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 24 | #694 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 18 | #779 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 19 | #869 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 26 | #609 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 26 | #639 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 31 | #531 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 28 | #581 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 34 | #502 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 39 | #448 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 55 | #364 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 19 | #671 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 20 | #601 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 13 | #768 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,189 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 16 | #651 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 9 | #811 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 14 | #615 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 15 | #549 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 9 | #643 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #707 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 7 | #695 |
Highest rank
Eulalia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #364 in 1893. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eulalia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.