Is Lucious a boy or girl name?
Lucious is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 26 boys were named Lucious, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 4,810 US babies named Lucious were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,138
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lucious since 1880
- 4,810
- Most popular year
- 1926
- 76 babies
Boys and girls named Lucious, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 142 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 139 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 186 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 517 | 5 | 1% |
| 1920s | 643 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 528 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 550 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 589 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 299 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 250 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 193 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 121 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 195 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 311 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 142 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26 | #4,138 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 23 | #4,546 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 33 | #3,506 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 33 | #3,463 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 27 | #3,877 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 29 | #3,767 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 42 | #2,869 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 45 | #2,743 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 53 | #2,427 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 37 | #3,128 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 19 | #4,989 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 20 | #4,739 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 24 | #4,208 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,110 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 24 | #4,187 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,121 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 18 | #5,183 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 29 | #3,657 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 35 | #3,130 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 33 | #3,140 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 8 | #8,618 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 13 | #5,757 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 10 | #6,850 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 14 | #5,305 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 10 | #6,643 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 5 | #10,948 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 10 | #6,129 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 11 | #5,515 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 18 | #3,772 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 23 | #3,071 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 10 | #5,633 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 11 | #5,115 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 19 | #3,282 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 14 | #4,108 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 14 | #3,934 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 23 | #2,565 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 16 | #3,146 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 19 | #2,745 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 17 | #2,902 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 17 | #2,770 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 21 | #2,382 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 20 | #2,483 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 24 | #2,174 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 22 | #2,332 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 34 | #1,694 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 20 | #2,338 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 24 | #2,038 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 19 | #2,388 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 29 | #1,735 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 20 | #2,173 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 26 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 27 | #1,708 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 27 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 24 | #1,828 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 24 | #1,709 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 24 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 31 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 25 | #1,562 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 22 | #1,699 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 27 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 33 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 37 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 38 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 38 | #1,285 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 66 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 49 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 50 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 54 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 53 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 73 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 58 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 60 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 66 | #865 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 60 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 75 | #796 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 59 | #896 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 58 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 56 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 58 | #826 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 50 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 54 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 47 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 48 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 45 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 50 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 52 | #866 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 60 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 47 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 51 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 54 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 48 | #901 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 62 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 44 | #1,009 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 60 | #851 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 62 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 63 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 65 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 76 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 63 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 64 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 73 | #775 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 73 | #787 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 51 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 53 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 71 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 67 | #799 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 67 | #771 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 60 | #799 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 58 | #800 | 5 | #4,682 |
| 1914 | 61 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 41 | #731 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 40 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 20 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 32 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 26 | #513 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 17 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 22 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 10 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 21 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 17 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 13 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 15 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 19 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 26 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 13 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 18 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 12 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 13 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 20 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 10 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 15 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 10 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 16 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 12 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 13 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 12 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 15 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 17 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 11 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 20 | #408 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 10 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 17 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 17 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 10 | #622 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lucious reached #408 in 1884. As a girl name, it reached #4,682 in 1915. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lucious
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.