Is Lucinda a boy or girl name?
Lucinda is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 118 girls and 0 boys were named Lucinda, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 38,292 US babies named Lucinda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,717
- Babies named Lucinda since 1880
- 38,292
- Most popular year
- 1957
- 1,030 babies
Boys and girls named Lucinda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 869 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 1,042 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 1,035 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,642 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,715 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,383 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 4,367 | 100% |
| 1950s | 11 | 8,988 | 99.9% |
| 1960s | 0 | 6,697 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 3,644 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 2,203 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,111 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,392 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,603 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 590 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,717 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,871 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,879 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,659 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,597 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 130 | #1,634 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,619 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 154 | #1,463 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 192 | #1,268 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,549 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 144 | #1,522 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,397 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 187 | #1,280 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,387 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 191 | #1,257 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,417 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,342 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,428 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,579 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,595 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,660 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,524 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 145 | #1,341 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,636 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,613 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,332 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,021 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,460 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,649 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,619 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,569 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,526 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,458 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,247 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 158 | #1,107 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,011 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,033 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 163 | #973 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 200 | #832 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 231 | #750 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 228 | #723 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 231 | #722 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 244 | #714 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 293 | #620 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 287 | #636 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 265 | #659 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 252 | #645 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 242 | #659 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 287 | #572 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 319 | #541 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 349 | #504 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 359 | #491 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 420 | #448 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 527 | #408 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 624 | #381 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 756 | #329 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 593 | #374 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 504 | #416 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 522 | #405 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 613 | #369 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 689 | #360 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 679 | #370 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 721 | #354 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 812 | #330 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 808 | #331 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 823 | #328 |
| 1958 | 6 | #3,776 | 899 | #298 |
| 1957 | 5 | #4,328 | 1,025 | #272 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 923 | #294 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 846 | #300 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 997 | #264 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 978 | #260 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 908 | #265 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 797 | #278 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 792 | #272 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 843 | #265 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 752 | #279 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 596 | #319 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 410 | #375 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 360 | #371 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 314 | #404 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 334 | #400 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 282 | #431 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 273 | #417 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 203 | #471 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 169 | #517 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 157 | #545 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 156 | #531 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 128 | #587 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 141 | #542 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 132 | #559 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 120 | #590 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 128 | #582 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 111 | #629 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 141 | #577 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 159 | #542 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 157 | #562 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 139 | #603 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 163 | #556 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 179 | #532 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 164 | #572 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 201 | #488 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 184 | #516 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 168 | #549 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 201 | #485 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 188 | #490 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 185 | #499 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 186 | #480 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 215 | #428 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 182 | #457 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 138 | #467 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 159 | #383 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 146 | #380 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 120 | #370 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 123 | #358 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 103 | #359 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 112 | #337 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 105 | #341 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 106 | #328 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 107 | #325 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 101 | #324 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 92 | #323 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 91 | #329 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 95 | #307 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 123 | #298 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 94 | #309 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 118 | #282 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 96 | #297 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 124 | #256 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 98 | #284 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 104 | #272 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 87 | #289 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 122 | #243 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 98 | #246 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 101 | #247 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 84 | #258 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 97 | #236 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 92 | #218 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 90 | #211 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 84 | #216 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 86 | #204 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 92 | #174 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 93 | #166 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 88 | #153 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 63 | #193 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lucinda reached #3,776 in 1958. As a girl name, it reached #153 in 1881. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lucinda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.