Is Lucile a boy or girl name?
Lucile is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 32 girls and 0 boys were named Lucile, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 34,956 US babies named Lucile were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,420
- Babies named Lucile since 1880
- 34,956
- Most popular year
- 1917
- 1,516 babies
Boys and girls named Lucile, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 701 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 2,412 | 100% |
| 1900s | 5 | 4,566 | 99.9% |
| 1910s | 40 | 11,738 | 99.7% |
| 1920s | 38 | 9,314 | 99.6% |
| 1930s | 13 | 2,913 | 99.6% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,349 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 708 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 218 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 80 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 54 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 106 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 232 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 313 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 156 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,420 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,307 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,634 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,494 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,586 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,227 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,045 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,760 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,312 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,895 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,514 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,707 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,669 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,305 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,093 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,637 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,720 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,826 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,223 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,931 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,775 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,078 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,375 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,007 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,419 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,572 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,828 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,558 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,562 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,334 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,398 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,161 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,322 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,739 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,274 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 12 | #6,787 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,893 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,174 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,873 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,734 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,828 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,797 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,699 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,638 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,745 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,496 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,673 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,988 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,391 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,759 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,020 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,191 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,387 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,657 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,512 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,747 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,576 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,980 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,873 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,631 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,616 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,415 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,231 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,180 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,149 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,059 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 94 | #974 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,061 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 89 | #954 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 100 | #883 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 112 | #825 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 131 | #750 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 108 | #793 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 119 | #684 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 131 | #647 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 147 | #628 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 155 | #598 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 181 | #512 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 165 | #533 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 188 | #490 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 190 | #484 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 233 | #424 |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,859 | 234 | #424 |
| 1935 | 8 | #2,855 | 266 | #395 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 281 | #382 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 306 | #361 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 367 | #332 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 361 | #336 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 487 | #302 |
| 1929 | 5 | #4,326 | 543 | #275 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 638 | #253 |
| 1927 | 6 | #4,022 | 716 | #243 |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,287 | 805 | #224 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 900 | #213 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 927 | #211 |
| 1923 | 9 | #3,085 | 1,055 | #198 |
| 1922 | 5 | #4,700 | 1,130 | #189 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 1,242 | #178 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,693 | 1,358 | #166 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,547 | 1,447 | #152 |
| 1918 | 6 | #3,992 | 1,448 | #156 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 1,516 | #142 |
| 1916 | 7 | #3,376 | 1,483 | #139 |
| 1915 | 8 | #2,966 | 1,441 | #135 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 1,166 | #129 |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,191 | 1,003 | #128 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 882 | #129 |
| 1911 | 6 | #1,658 | 654 | #128 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 698 | #118 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 570 | #124 |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,518 | 592 | #115 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 508 | #133 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 485 | #130 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 479 | #131 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 433 | #133 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 370 | #145 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 388 | #143 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 346 | #142 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 395 | #147 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 305 | #151 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 330 | #153 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 269 | #166 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 300 | #156 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 248 | #169 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 239 | #171 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 194 | #183 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 201 | #179 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 177 | #181 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 149 | #196 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 135 | #196 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 94 | #239 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 85 | #226 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 71 | #247 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 78 | #224 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 55 | #263 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 49 | #258 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 58 | #228 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 36 | #272 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 40 | #248 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lucile reached #1,518 in 1908. As a girl name, it reached #115 in 1908. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lucile
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.