Is Jeannie a boy or girl name?
Jeannie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 22 girls and 0 boys were named Jeannie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 36,152 US babies named Jeannie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,677
- Babies named Jeannie since 1882
- 36,152
- Most popular year
- 1957
- 1,430 babies
Boys and girls named Jeannie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 41 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 49 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 215 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 652 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,243 | 100% |
| 1940s | 6 | 5,249 | 99.9% |
| 1950s | 16 | 9,791 | 99.8% |
| 1960s | 10 | 7,357 | 99.9% |
| 1970s | 17 | 6,481 | 99.7% |
| 1980s | 6 | 3,031 | 99.8% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,097 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 494 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 255 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 112 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,677 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,685 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,534 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,269 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,178 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,688 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,130 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,985 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,575 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,555 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,568 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,811 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,027 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,856 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,316 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,146 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 38 | #4,123 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 39 | #4,012 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,885 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,187 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,937 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,719 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,434 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,021 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,609 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,269 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,112 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,059 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,534 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,525 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,429 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,489 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 149 | #1,177 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 172 | #1,057 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,171 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 174 | #992 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 200 | #881 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 235 | #767 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 249 | #719 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 301 | #624 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 338 | #554 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 297 | #599 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 371 | #527 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 392 | #509 |
| 1980 | 6 | #5,856 | 474 | #451 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 426 | #477 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 407 | #480 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 475 | #425 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 513 | #399 |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,854 | 699 | #324 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 820 | #291 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 673 | #331 |
| 1972 | 6 | #4,689 | 805 | #302 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 833 | #320 |
| 1970 | 6 | #4,474 | 830 | #323 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 768 | #328 |
| 1968 | 5 | #4,406 | 670 | #337 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 638 | #355 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 681 | #342 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 549 | #398 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 651 | #375 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 709 | #357 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 755 | #343 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 879 | #313 |
| 1960 | 5 | #4,312 | 1,057 | #279 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 990 | #286 |
| 1958 | 5 | #4,212 | 1,065 | #269 |
| 1957 | 6 | #3,755 | 1,424 | #222 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 1,149 | #246 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 997 | #272 |
| 1954 | 5 | #4,084 | 921 | #280 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 895 | #278 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 848 | #277 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 727 | #291 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 775 | #274 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 797 | #273 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 736 | #282 |
| 1947 | 6 | #3,537 | 727 | #289 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 669 | #286 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 478 | #311 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 428 | #332 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 407 | #353 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 360 | #374 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 367 | #344 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 280 | #412 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 192 | #484 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 152 | #554 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 142 | #571 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 121 | #599 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 115 | #609 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 134 | #557 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 116 | #604 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 110 | #638 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 66 | #849 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 95 | #714 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 75 | #816 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 83 | #788 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 61 | #977 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 86 | #779 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 69 | #891 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 81 | #836 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 62 | #935 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,051 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,175 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,217 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,168 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,514 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,451 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,368 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,596 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,360 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,824 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,232 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,068 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,847 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,533 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,234 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,935 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,834 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,076 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,695 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,802 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,497 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,818 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,460 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,361 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,349 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,072 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 10 | #864 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,188 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 8 | #820 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 6 | #862 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 5 | #966 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jeannie reached #3,537 in 1947. As a girl name, it reached #222 in 1957. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jeannie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.