Is Santo a boy or girl name?
Santo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 37 boys were named Santo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,844 US babies named Santo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,254
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Santo since 1907
- 4,844
- Most popular year
- 1925
- 116 babies
Boys and girls named Santo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 21 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 612 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 953 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 642 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 416 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 396 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 434 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 356 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 245 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 234 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 225 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 154 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 156 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37 | #3,254 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 42 | #2,989 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 26 | #4,166 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 28 | #3,895 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 23 | #4,394 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 15 | #6,050 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 16 | #5,733 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 17 | #5,484 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 21 | #4,746 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 7 | #10,427 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 12 | #6,979 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 16 | #5,610 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 17 | #5,445 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 14 | #6,195 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 19 | #5,001 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,139 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 12 | #7,112 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 29 | #3,677 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 20 | #4,647 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 16 | #5,237 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 29 | #3,355 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 20 | #4,250 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 24 | #3,648 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 29 | #3,129 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 21 | #3,889 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 18 | #4,126 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,821 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 22 | #3,330 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 24 | #3,090 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 29 | #2,615 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 30 | #2,549 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 24 | #2,928 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 27 | #2,654 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 20 | #3,204 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 21 | #3,044 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 30 | #2,286 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 24 | #2,498 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 23 | #2,458 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 13 | #3,620 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 14 | #3,359 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 30 | #1,879 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 23 | #2,262 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 25 | #2,158 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 34 | #1,722 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 29 | #1,956 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 33 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 47 | #1,348 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 30 | #1,770 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 29 | #1,775 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 31 | #1,653 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 43 | #1,306 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 39 | #1,349 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 32 | #1,533 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 35 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 37 | #1,393 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 46 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 54 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 34 | #1,309 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 42 | #1,157 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 45 | #1,124 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 35 | #1,347 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 53 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 46 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 32 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 47 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 34 | #1,357 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 52 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 40 | #1,246 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 40 | #1,213 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 40 | #1,195 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 43 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 34 | #1,303 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 31 | #1,376 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 46 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 36 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 45 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 50 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 43 | #1,115 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 46 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 28 | #1,264 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 41 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 39 | #1,101 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 40 | #1,087 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 46 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 38 | #1,062 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 53 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 60 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 44 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 62 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 72 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 56 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 62 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 86 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 61 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 86 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 102 | #601 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 92 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 88 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 96 | #645 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 116 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 90 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 94 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 83 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 103 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 89 | #679 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 72 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 79 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 98 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 86 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 99 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 67 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 38 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 46 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 19 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,293 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Santo reached #571 in 1915. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Santo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.