Is Vilma a boy or girl name?
Vilma is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 21 girls and 0 boys were named Vilma, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,975 US babies named Vilma were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,927
- Babies named Vilma since 1901
- 4,975
- Most popular year
- 1927
- 213 babies
Boys and girls named Vilma, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 64 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 360 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 952 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 687 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 251 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 455 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 666 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 321 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 345 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 359 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 254 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 158 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 103 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,927 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,536 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,967 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,672 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,062 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,683 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,738 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,748 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,973 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,962 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,620 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,581 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,437 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,116 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,676 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,218 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 29 | #5,134 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,884 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,451 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,253 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,205 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,580 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,613 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,306 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,074 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,439 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,363 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,505 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,503 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,354 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,230 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,048 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,034 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,387 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,521 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,368 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,596 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,397 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,720 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,169 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,524 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,474 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,257 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,142 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,212 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,146 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,385 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,482 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,000 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,059 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,252 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,749 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,942 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,173 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,159 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,633 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,775 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,945 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,473 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,526 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,228 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,297 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,144 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,258 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,125 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 118 | #977 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,378 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,549 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,735 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,939 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,983 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,927 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,710 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,662 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,652 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,842 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,066 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,789 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,807 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,054 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,963 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,553 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,704 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,606 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,548 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,265 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,218 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,302 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 52 | #960 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 50 | #983 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 63 | #864 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 67 | #819 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 84 | #739 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 120 | #606 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 147 | #563 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 198 | #481 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 177 | #523 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 213 | #478 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 117 | #672 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,034 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,474 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,230 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,308 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,125 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,348 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,193 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,090 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 52 | #977 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,041 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,024 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 39 | #954 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,001 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 32 | #902 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 23 | #931 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,627 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,215 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,542 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,374 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,318 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,218 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,651 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,033 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,931 |
Highest rank
Vilma has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #478 in 1927. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Vilma
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.