Is Emilio a boy or girl name?
Emilio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 2,358 boys were named Emilio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 51,599 US babies named Emilio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #152
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Emilio since 1882
- 51,599
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 2,358 babies
Boys and girls named Emilio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 23 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 127 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 717 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,419 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,187 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,095 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,387 | 5 | 0.4% |
| 1960s | 1,563 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,957 | 10 | 0.5% |
| 1980s | 2,685 | 13 | 0.5% |
| 1990s | 6,731 | 25 | 0.4% |
| 2000s | 10,212 | 5 | 0% |
| 2010s | 12,762 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 9,651 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,358 | #152 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 2,015 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 1,907 | #198 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 1,743 | #219 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 1,628 | #229 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 1,579 | #240 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 1,494 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 1,397 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,345 | #274 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,191 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,281 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,179 | #299 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,171 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 1,090 | #302 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,035 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,027 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,209 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 1,248 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,123 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 1,217 | #274 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 1,070 | #297 | 5 | #16,914 |
| 2003 | 957 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 815 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 756 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 790 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 770 | #345 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 789 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 815 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 767 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 644 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 618 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 667 | #354 | 6 | #12,255 |
| 1992 | 595 | #385 | 6 | #12,233 |
| 1991 | 557 | #409 | 8 | #9,595 |
| 1990 | 509 | #436 | 5 | #13,629 |
| 1989 | 456 | #442 | 5 | #12,986 |
| 1988 | 347 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 288 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 242 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 223 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 216 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 220 | #570 | 8 | #7,503 |
| 1982 | 254 | #537 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 235 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 204 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 203 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 206 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 219 | #564 | 5 | #10,071 |
| 1976 | 182 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 194 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 199 | #568 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 199 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 193 | #573 | 5 | #8,649 |
| 1971 | 186 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 176 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 185 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 160 | #601 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 173 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 133 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 157 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 153 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 159 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 148 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 148 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 147 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 142 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 149 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 149 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 132 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 153 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 130 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 143 | #607 | 5 | #5,927 |
| 1952 | 134 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 130 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 125 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 134 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 127 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 141 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 100 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 100 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 120 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 101 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 90 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 91 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 91 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 88 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 102 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 91 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 98 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 113 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 126 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 120 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 135 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 139 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 175 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 146 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 178 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 141 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 130 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 164 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 166 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 139 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 117 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 115 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 123 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 91 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 109 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 101 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 99 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 85 | #630 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 82 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 60 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 50 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 19 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 21 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 23 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 16 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 17 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 9 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 8 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 14 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 8 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 7 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 10 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 15 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 8 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,147 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 7 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,090 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 7 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 6 | #871 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Emilio reached #152 in 2024. As a girl name, it reached #5,927 in 1953. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Emilio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.