Is Emmaline a boy or girl name?
Emmaline is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 197 girls and 0 boys were named Emmaline, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 7,238 US babies named Emmaline were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,198
- Babies named Emmaline since 1880
- 7,238
- Most popular year
- 2014
- 312 babies
Boys and girls named Emmaline, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 80 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 106 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 281 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 312 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 192 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 140 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 85 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 34 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 116 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 566 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,305 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,807 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,116 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,198 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 192 | #1,227 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 234 | #1,075 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 231 | #1,082 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 262 | #973 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 289 | #918 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 300 | #898 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 299 | #898 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 312 | #897 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 305 | #904 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 312 | #878 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 263 | #959 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 297 | #891 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 226 | #1,086 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 204 | #1,192 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,411 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,422 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,730 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,910 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,722 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,490 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 141 | #1,412 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,458 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,588 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,744 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,863 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,743 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,853 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,064 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,746 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,441 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,608 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,838 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,321 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,039 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,924 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,531 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,221 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,591 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,614 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,594 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,505 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,048 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,957 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,425 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,221 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,761 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,796 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,382 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,809 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,805 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,148 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,897 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,456 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,554 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,398 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,614 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,647 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,564 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,384 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,806 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,032 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,903 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,155 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,287 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,362 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,426 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,479 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,512 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,640 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,544 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,099 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,143 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,122 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,133 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,233 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,768 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,024 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,605 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,460 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,944 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,083 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,061 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,703 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,582 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,906 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,037 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,741 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,286 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,385 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,622 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,362 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,316 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,132 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,289 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,142 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,421 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,350 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,233 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 45 | #994 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,274 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,420 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,041 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 23 | #909 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,451 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,172 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,287 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,003 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,179 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,189 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,724 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,363 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,041 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,162 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,255 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,206 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 14 | #933 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,302 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,467 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,476 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,273 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 13 | #834 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #977 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #959 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,184 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 13 | #735 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 7 | #975 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,157 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 8 | #808 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 8 | #810 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 6 | #768 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 14 | #455 |
Highest rank
Emmaline has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #455 in 1880. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Emmaline
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.