Is Emmalee a boy or girl name?
Emmalee is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 61 girls and 0 boys were named Emmalee, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 8,958 US babies named Emmalee were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,773
- Babies named Emmalee since 1909
- 8,958
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 441 babies
Boys and girls named Emmalee, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 57 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 87 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 43 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1960s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 352 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,340 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,596 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,845 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 502 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,773 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,867 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,955 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,843 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,656 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,430 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 175 | #1,302 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 230 | #1,099 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 262 | #1,009 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 278 | #973 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 322 | #858 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 354 | #769 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 335 | #800 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 383 | #722 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 350 | #786 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 394 | #734 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 399 | #744 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 372 | #778 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 410 | #690 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 441 | #634 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 423 | #648 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 393 | #673 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 281 | #830 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 251 | #903 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 232 | #928 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 245 | #877 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,067 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 183 | #1,044 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 140 | #1,248 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,204 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,394 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,531 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,706 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,964 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,977 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,126 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,194 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,284 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,926 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,370 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,799 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,928 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,198 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,770 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,624 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,174 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,503 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,725 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,197 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,688 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,985 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,808 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,085 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,042 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,091 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,920 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,844 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,100 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,004 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,980 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,241 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,192 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,995 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,615 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,603 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,791 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,985 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,504 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,661 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,209 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,985 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,238 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,236 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,174 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,865 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,100 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,247 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,970 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,317 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,940 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,029 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,825 |
Highest rank
Emmalee has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #634 in 2005. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Emmalee
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.