Is Enoch a boy or girl name?
Enoch is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 367 boys were named Enoch, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 12,759 US babies named Enoch were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #718
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Enoch since 1880
- 12,759
- Most popular year
- 2023
- 375 babies
Boys and girls named Enoch, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 404 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 345 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 248 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 832 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 943 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 669 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 630 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 588 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 455 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 604 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 556 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 689 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,378 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 2,771 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 1,647 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 367 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 375 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 306 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 304 | #805 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 295 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 300 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 318 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 313 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 343 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 297 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 337 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 257 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 196 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 214 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 196 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 167 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 158 | #1,147 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 149 | #1,183 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 124 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 147 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 134 | #1,167 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 146 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 139 | #1,079 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 106 | #1,258 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 108 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 90 | #1,333 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 75 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 68 | #1,524 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 73 | #1,427 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 56 | #1,631 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 76 | #1,340 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 66 | #1,433 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 58 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 59 | #1,486 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 68 | #1,354 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 56 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 48 | #1,532 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 51 | #1,429 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 50 | #1,404 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 62 | #1,194 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 51 | #1,303 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 49 | #1,335 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 70 | #1,090 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 60 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 59 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 57 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 73 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 64 | #1,085 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 72 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 54 | #1,151 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 76 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 70 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 41 | #1,311 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 43 | #1,278 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 54 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 60 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 36 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 39 | #1,205 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 41 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 38 | #1,244 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 39 | #1,243 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 37 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 60 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 61 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 44 | #1,183 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 53 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 54 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 57 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 67 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 55 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 60 | #956 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 52 | #1,006 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 60 | #917 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 63 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 67 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 51 | #975 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 64 | #856 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 57 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 75 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 60 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 78 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 64 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 59 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 60 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 62 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 49 | #895 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 53 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 58 | #809 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 72 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 64 | #773 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 73 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 69 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 70 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 68 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 93 | #638 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 75 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 83 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 90 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 89 | #673 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 81 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 106 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 105 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 93 | #668 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 111 | #601 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 110 | #601 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 112 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 122 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 126 | #513 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 101 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 89 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 76 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 67 | #524 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 59 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 44 | #441 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 36 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 24 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 25 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 21 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 28 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 24 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 22 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 26 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 22 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 20 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 36 | #367 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 41 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 30 | #354 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 24 | #388 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 29 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 39 | #283 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 35 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 30 | #319 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 27 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 43 | #243 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 47 | #247 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 33 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 30 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 23 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 50 | #238 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 43 | #253 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 30 | #319 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 44 | #241 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 47 | #246 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 44 | #229 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 60 | #202 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Enoch reached #202 in 1880. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.