Is Rosalee a boy or girl name?
Rosalee is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 272 girls and 0 boys were named Rosalee, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 12,626 US babies named Rosalee were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #959
- Babies named Rosalee since 1880
- 12,626
- Most popular year
- 2020
- 346 babies
Boys and girls named Rosalee, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 29 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 142 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 270 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 954 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,602 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,739 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,697 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 753 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 426 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 330 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 391 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 322 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 412 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,080 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,479 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 272 | #959 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 240 | #1,049 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 280 | #960 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 341 | #814 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 346 | #788 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 285 | #929 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 322 | #844 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 254 | #1,023 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 248 | #1,053 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 228 | #1,123 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 213 | #1,161 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 192 | #1,245 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,600 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,948 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 100 | #2,007 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,960 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 38 | #4,158 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,966 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,719 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,357 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,680 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,513 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,713 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,407 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,158 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,177 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,114 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,428 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,553 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,478 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,768 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,149 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,758 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,275 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,209 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,972 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,208 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,354 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,330 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,846 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,507 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,346 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,569 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,221 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,475 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,841 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,007 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,650 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,127 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,157 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,072 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,389 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,497 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,463 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,004 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,951 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,081 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,065 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,238 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,614 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,683 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,475 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,822 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,691 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,651 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,311 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,539 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,339 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,309 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,183 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,479 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,129 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,016 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 121 | #815 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 109 | #848 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 135 | #735 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 142 | #704 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 163 | #654 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 157 | #629 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 144 | #600 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 169 | #561 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 199 | #535 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 202 | #524 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 186 | #507 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 200 | #482 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 206 | #467 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 274 | #405 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 153 | #539 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 130 | #583 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 149 | #529 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 159 | #512 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 151 | #519 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 169 | #504 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 171 | #493 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 177 | #503 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 176 | #512 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 161 | #550 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 174 | #539 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 151 | #579 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 138 | #625 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 152 | #608 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 167 | #562 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 145 | #599 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 156 | #579 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 182 | #522 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 141 | #596 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 140 | #603 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 149 | #555 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 101 | #683 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 108 | #635 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 100 | #564 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 73 | #609 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 61 | #637 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 35 | #739 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 46 | #628 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 33 | #704 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 39 | #612 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 34 | #646 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 22 | #790 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 33 | #617 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 32 | #608 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 19 | #808 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 24 | #711 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,123 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 24 | #757 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 19 | #750 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 16 | #881 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 21 | #696 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 18 | #783 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 12 | #973 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 13 | #897 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,080 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,421 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 12 | #833 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 16 | #688 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 10 | #881 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,254 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 9 | #787 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 5 | #923 |
Highest rank
Rosalee has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #405 in 1938. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rosalee
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.