Is Rosalia a boy or girl name?
Rosalia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 504 girls and 0 boys were named Rosalia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 10,181 US babies named Rosalia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #597
- Babies named Rosalia since 1880
- 10,181
- Most popular year
- 2023
- 517 babies
Boys and girls named Rosalia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 80 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 167 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 243 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 626 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 678 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 395 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 355 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 471 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 577 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 692 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 762 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 729 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 803 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,249 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 2,354 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 504 | #597 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 517 | #579 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 501 | #598 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 461 | #646 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 371 | #737 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 179 | #1,288 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,561 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,550 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,646 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 141 | #1,561 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,742 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,665 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,996 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 91 | #2,118 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,399 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,161 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,681 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,271 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,222 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,156 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,340 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,315 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 82 | #2,095 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,112 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,171 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,150 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,453 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,979 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,912 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,814 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,712 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,443 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,826 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,851 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,843 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,815 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,146 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,056 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,732 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,925 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,485 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,642 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,218 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,269 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,326 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,115 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,686 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,619 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,520 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,569 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,482 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,493 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,716 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,524 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,594 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,528 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,446 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,472 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,584 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,497 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,367 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,578 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,427 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,529 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,536 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,510 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,511 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,419 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,576 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,767 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,644 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,436 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,347 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,518 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,271 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,299 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,322 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,935 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,499 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,442 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,538 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,302 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,382 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,378 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,512 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,214 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,110 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,572 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,147 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,349 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,144 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,154 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 51 | #995 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,019 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,099 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 56 | #967 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 59 | #972 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 71 | #890 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,019 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 71 | #883 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 81 | #838 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 73 | #862 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 67 | #895 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 71 | #882 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 75 | #841 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 59 | #923 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 81 | #794 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 93 | #728 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 77 | #786 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 92 | #694 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 60 | #745 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 59 | #676 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 46 | #745 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 29 | #809 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 30 | #791 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 28 | #771 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 28 | #739 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 27 | #735 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 30 | #673 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 25 | #728 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 18 | #875 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 25 | #678 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,011 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 22 | #698 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 27 | #699 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 20 | #725 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 16 | #882 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 28 | #580 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 16 | #835 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 18 | #764 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 23 | #624 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,081 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 15 | #789 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 13 | #785 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #994 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 10 | #893 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,114 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 12 | #687 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,255 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,174 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,007 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 8 | #748 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 8 | #728 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 10 | #576 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 9 | #623 |
Highest rank
Rosalia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #576 in 1881. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rosalia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.