Is Enola a boy or girl name?
Enola is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 57 girls and 0 boys were named Enola, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,040 US babies named Enola were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,889
- Babies named Enola since 1885
- 3,040
- Most popular year
- 1953
- 99 babies
Boys and girls named Enola, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 28 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 125 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 176 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 470 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 561 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 303 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 209 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 359 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 152 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 29 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 141 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 119 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 291 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,889 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,524 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,934 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,106 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,721 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,685 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,889 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,197 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,129 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,358 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,798 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,550 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,685 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,629 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,663 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,645 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,411 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,218 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,599 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,489 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,406 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,143 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,144 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,945 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,716 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,660 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,889 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,087 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,862 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,441 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,954 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,334 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,544 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,077 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,726 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,496 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,894 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,813 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,754 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,712 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,335 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,591 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,880 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,394 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,424 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,767 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,616 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,499 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,844 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,631 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,269 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,475 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,952 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,935 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,685 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,559 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,353 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 99 | #951 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,251 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,790 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,702 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,294 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,522 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,672 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,112 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,630 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,231 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,100 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,540 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,546 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,604 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,248 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,715 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,427 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,518 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,461 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,272 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,183 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,535 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,152 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,218 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,080 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,166 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,102 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 65 | #927 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,024 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,006 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,133 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 71 | #869 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 57 | #992 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 73 | #846 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 62 | #893 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 68 | #871 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 55 | #936 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 61 | #875 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 59 | #851 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 43 | #890 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 38 | #857 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 33 | #878 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 29 | #804 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 22 | #923 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 19 | #944 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 21 | #857 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 20 | #850 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,012 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 19 | #855 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 22 | #757 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 13 | #993 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 16 | #882 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 13 | #933 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 19 | #868 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,046 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 16 | #853 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,058 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,337 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 15 | #827 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 16 | #759 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 22 | #617 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 12 | #869 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 11 | #856 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,254 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,185 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 9 | #810 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 7 | #925 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #960 |
Highest rank
Enola has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #617 in 1893. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.