Is Erick a boy or girl name?
Erick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 1,038 boys were named Erick, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.5% of the 78,993 US babies named Erick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #332
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Erick since 1883
- 78,993
- Most popular year
- 2007
- 2,437 babies
Boys and girls named Erick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 140 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 194 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 147 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 472 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 939 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 3,295 | 10 | 0.3% |
| 1970s | 7,167 | 79 | 1.1% |
| 1980s | 9,001 | 94 | 1% |
| 1990s | 15,681 | 146 | 0.9% |
| 2000s | 21,429 | 77 | 0.4% |
| 2010s | 14,668 | 11 | 0.1% |
| 2020s | 5,359 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,038 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 1,107 | #302 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 1,047 | #321 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 1,041 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 1,126 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 1,283 | #277 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 1,247 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 1,433 | #256 | 5 | #16,615 |
| 2016 | 1,602 | #239 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,372 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,443 | #258 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,360 | #260 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,520 | #236 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 1,546 | #232 | 6 | #15,429 |
| 2010 | 1,862 | #200 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 2,004 | #191 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 2,220 | #179 | 8 | #12,969 |
| 2007 | 2,432 | #166 | 5 | #18,500 |
| 2006 | 2,346 | #174 | 5 | #18,008 |
| 2005 | 2,244 | #181 | 7 | #13,447 |
| 2004 | 2,232 | #180 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 2,094 | #186 | 15 | #7,320 |
| 2002 | 2,052 | #182 | 7 | #12,639 |
| 2001 | 1,921 | #192 | 13 | #7,875 |
| 2000 | 1,884 | #190 | 17 | #6,292 |
| 1999 | 1,742 | #193 | 11 | #8,402 |
| 1998 | 1,577 | #206 | 9 | #9,529 |
| 1997 | 1,616 | #197 | 11 | #7,938 |
| 1996 | 1,705 | #188 | 17 | #5,601 |
| 1995 | 1,609 | #191 | 8 | #9,869 |
| 1994 | 1,679 | #185 | 14 | #6,427 |
| 1993 | 1,502 | #203 | 16 | #5,756 |
| 1992 | 1,373 | #222 | 18 | #5,336 |
| 1991 | 1,508 | #207 | 20 | #4,862 |
| 1990 | 1,370 | #223 | 22 | #4,417 |
| 1989 | 1,071 | #245 | 11 | #7,121 |
| 1988 | 929 | #252 | 9 | #7,902 |
| 1987 | 917 | #250 | 12 | #6,040 |
| 1986 | 840 | #262 | 9 | #7,293 |
| 1985 | 825 | #263 | 12 | #5,768 |
| 1984 | 880 | #249 | 9 | #6,969 |
| 1983 | 863 | #247 | 6 | #9,377 |
| 1982 | 874 | #252 | 6 | #9,565 |
| 1981 | 874 | #250 | 8 | #7,612 |
| 1980 | 928 | #240 | 12 | #5,626 |
| 1979 | 902 | #244 | 11 | #5,855 |
| 1978 | 784 | #259 | 10 | #6,076 |
| 1977 | 644 | #301 | 6 | #8,767 |
| 1976 | 714 | #272 | 10 | #5,717 |
| 1975 | 629 | #301 | 7 | #7,387 |
| 1974 | 685 | #274 | 9 | #5,895 |
| 1973 | 669 | #274 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 748 | #263 | 8 | #6,113 |
| 1971 | 766 | #276 | 18 | #3,552 |
| 1970 | 626 | #313 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 530 | #340 | 5 | #7,812 |
| 1968 | 469 | #358 | 5 | #7,333 |
| 1967 | 460 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 396 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 456 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 289 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 197 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 195 | #564 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 139 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 164 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 152 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 145 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 121 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 94 | #757 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 64 | #935 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 65 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 61 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 87 | #759 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 76 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 74 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 92 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 71 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 72 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 59 | #856 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 52 | #865 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 29 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 28 | #1,320 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 25 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 22 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 22 | #1,446 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 14 | #1,905 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 11 | #2,232 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 23 | #1,420 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 14 | #1,905 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 17 | #1,727 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 13 | #2,053 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 12 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 18 | #1,739 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 10 | #2,534 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 15 | #1,998 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 18 | #1,815 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 16 | #1,993 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 16 | #2,068 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 17 | #1,929 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 14 | #2,231 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 29 | #1,389 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 25 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 27 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 14 | #2,287 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 18 | #1,907 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 20 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 17 | #1,930 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 15 | #2,020 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 21 | #1,564 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 26 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 21 | #1,308 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 12 | #1,608 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 8 | #1,935 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 10 | #969 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 7 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 6 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 10 | #742 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 5 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 6 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 5 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 10 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 8 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 7 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #943 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Erick reached #166 in 2007. As a girl name, it reached #3,552 in 1971. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Erick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.