Is Marco a boy or girl name?
Marco is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 840 boys were named Marco, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 76,042 US babies named Marco were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #387
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Marco since 1910
- 76,042
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 2,117 babies
Boys and girls named Marco, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 469 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 373 | 5 | 1.3% |
| 1940s | 473 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,272 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 3,728 | 26 | 0.7% |
| 1970s | 7,914 | 101 | 1.3% |
| 1980s | 9,826 | 97 | 1% |
| 1990s | 17,001 | 83 | 0.5% |
| 2000s | 19,122 | 27 | 0.1% |
| 2010s | 11,125 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 4,124 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 840 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 835 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 877 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 786 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 786 | #393 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 830 | #379 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 918 | #360 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 1,010 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,063 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,086 | #320 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,129 | #310 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,216 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,304 | #272 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 1,257 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,312 | #264 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,463 | #243 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,678 | #224 | 7 | #14,816 |
| 2007 | 1,867 | #209 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,865 | #206 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 2,117 | #187 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 2,011 | #191 | 6 | #15,358 |
| 2003 | 1,960 | #192 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 2,026 | #186 | 9 | #10,764 |
| 2001 | 2,109 | #179 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 2,026 | #181 | 5 | #16,630 |
| 1999 | 1,771 | #191 | 8 | #11,011 |
| 1998 | 1,854 | #181 | 10 | #9,018 |
| 1997 | 1,923 | #176 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 1,923 | #174 | 5 | #14,928 |
| 1995 | 1,764 | #179 | 12 | #7,352 |
| 1994 | 1,688 | #184 | 11 | #7,952 |
| 1993 | 1,646 | #190 | 10 | #8,455 |
| 1992 | 1,574 | #198 | 8 | #10,079 |
| 1991 | 1,515 | #203 | 10 | #8,358 |
| 1990 | 1,343 | #226 | 9 | #8,942 |
| 1989 | 1,154 | #234 | 8 | #9,292 |
| 1988 | 1,081 | #228 | 8 | #8,889 |
| 1987 | 959 | #243 | 11 | #6,592 |
| 1986 | 912 | #246 | 10 | #6,917 |
| 1985 | 965 | #241 | 13 | #5,553 |
| 1984 | 896 | #244 | 7 | #8,740 |
| 1983 | 910 | #243 | 6 | #9,741 |
| 1982 | 1,033 | #228 | 10 | #6,662 |
| 1981 | 905 | #246 | 16 | #4,648 |
| 1980 | 1,011 | #233 | 8 | #7,835 |
| 1979 | 956 | #235 | 8 | #7,732 |
| 1978 | 853 | #243 | 22 | #3,451 |
| 1977 | 850 | #242 | 15 | #4,556 |
| 1976 | 789 | #251 | 6 | #8,790 |
| 1975 | 756 | #261 | 5 | #9,973 |
| 1974 | 750 | #260 | 9 | #6,039 |
| 1973 | 778 | #252 | 9 | #5,852 |
| 1972 | 728 | #267 | 12 | #4,680 |
| 1971 | 747 | #280 | 8 | #6,368 |
| 1970 | 707 | #293 | 7 | #6,759 |
| 1969 | 595 | #313 | 8 | #5,769 |
| 1968 | 485 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 437 | #360 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 395 | #383 | 7 | #5,594 |
| 1965 | 387 | #398 | 6 | #6,241 |
| 1964 | 355 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 336 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 313 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 220 | #537 | 5 | #7,174 |
| 1960 | 205 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 210 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 165 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 143 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 138 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 117 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 116 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 99 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 109 | #666 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 95 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 80 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 65 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 53 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 68 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 42 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 36 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 48 | #929 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 51 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 39 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 37 | #1,084 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 34 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 38 | #1,046 | 5 | #4,673 |
| 1938 | 42 | #986 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 29 | #1,257 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 27 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 27 | #1,315 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 33 | #1,165 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 36 | #1,099 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 36 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 53 | #884 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 52 | #938 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 47 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 34 | #1,244 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 46 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 49 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 54 | #920 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 43 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 45 | #1,072 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 53 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 50 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 48 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 33 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 48 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 34 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 40 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 38 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 30 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 21 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 16 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 11 | #1,095 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 5 | #1,759 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Marco reached #174 in 1996. As a girl name, it reached #3,451 in 1978. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Marco
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.