Is Juliana a boy or girl name?
Juliana is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 1,267 girls and 0 boys were named Juliana, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 66,583 US babies named Juliana were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #250
- Babies named Juliana since 1881
- 66,583
- Most popular year
- 2007
- 2,224 babies
Boys and girls named Juliana, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 74 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 428 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 610 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 571 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 957 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,530 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,952 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,650 | 100% |
| 1980s | 28 | 3,981 | 99.3% |
| 1990s | 10 | 7,713 | 99.9% |
| 2000s | 5 | 20,061 | 100% |
| 2010s | 6 | 19,999 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 6,832 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 1,267 | #250 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 1,244 | #250 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 1,363 | #220 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 1,434 | #209 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 1,524 | #189 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 1,654 | #175 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 1,852 | #152 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 2,002 | #147 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 1,951 | #163 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 1,905 | #168 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 2,062 | #159 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 2,097 | #151 |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,498 | 2,218 | #147 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 2,130 | #147 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 2,128 | #146 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 2,074 | #153 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 2,150 | #157 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 2,224 | #162 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 2,184 | #162 |
| 2005 | 5 | #12,334 | 1,948 | #176 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 2,031 | #164 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 2,129 | #157 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 1,926 | #171 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 2,076 | #155 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 1,319 | #241 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 1,187 | #267 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 1,037 | #289 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 941 | #310 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 824 | #339 |
| 1995 | 5 | #9,553 | 706 | #370 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 642 | #394 |
| 1993 | 5 | #9,439 | 567 | #441 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 574 | #438 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 639 | #399 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 596 | #427 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 571 | #432 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 452 | #498 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 456 | #474 |
| 1986 | 5 | #7,260 | 430 | #497 |
| 1985 | 9 | #4,507 | 517 | #425 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 303 | #594 |
| 1983 | 5 | #6,770 | 334 | #553 |
| 1982 | 9 | #4,406 | 425 | #485 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 280 | #635 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 213 | #773 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 187 | #834 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 166 | #883 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 165 | #874 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 158 | #862 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 157 | #851 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 130 | #956 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 149 | #865 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 168 | #806 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 194 | #754 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 176 | #796 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 175 | #768 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 149 | #835 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 163 | #773 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 179 | #737 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 215 | #672 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 219 | #699 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 200 | #724 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 255 | #632 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 218 | #708 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 179 | #762 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 158 | #817 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 153 | #816 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 187 | #733 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 192 | #692 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 166 | #737 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 150 | #762 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 145 | #759 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 144 | #740 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 129 | #782 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 106 | #862 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 127 | #768 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 137 | #720 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 97 | #902 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 75 | #963 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 61 | #989 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 88 | #813 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 86 | #839 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 95 | #783 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 93 | #738 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 98 | #704 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 72 | #816 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 87 | #741 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 60 | #894 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,027 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 50 | #979 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 48 | #996 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 58 | #888 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 57 | #937 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,097 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,036 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 57 | #954 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 63 | #938 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,074 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 64 | #934 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 64 | #937 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 65 | #944 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 61 | #945 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 59 | #972 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 66 | #915 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 60 | #943 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,185 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 60 | #923 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 52 | #967 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 75 | #788 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 46 | #983 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 54 | #793 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,078 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 39 | #800 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 21 | #973 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,186 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 27 | #781 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 19 | #928 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,172 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 15 | #985 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,357 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 14 | #979 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,261 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,702 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,043 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,369 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,232 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,822 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 12 | #977 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,163 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,290 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,238 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,049 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,054 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #978 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 12 | #775 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,209 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 8 | #903 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 9 | #800 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,121 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 5 | #886 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Juliana reached #4,406 in 1982. As a girl name, it reached #146 in 2010. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Juliana
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.