Is Dominick a boy or girl name?
Dominick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 538 boys were named Dominick, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 66,988 US babies named Dominick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #552
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Dominick since 1881
- 66,988
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 1,788 babies
Boys and girls named Dominick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 45 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 166 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 425 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 3,915 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 5,289 | 5 | 0.1% |
| 1930s | 2,964 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 2,656 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 3,187 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 3,103 | 6 | 0.2% |
| 1970s | 2,877 | 16 | 0.6% |
| 1980s | 3,974 | 71 | 1.8% |
| 1990s | 8,985 | 96 | 1.1% |
| 2000s | 15,275 | 67 | 0.4% |
| 2010s | 10,943 | 6 | 0.1% |
| 2020s | 2,917 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 538 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 528 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 566 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 615 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 670 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 713 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 779 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 907 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,032 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,113 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,129 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,285 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,364 | #262 | 6 | #15,485 |
| 2011 | 1,296 | #268 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,325 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,439 | #246 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,541 | #239 | 5 | #18,293 |
| 2007 | 1,631 | #226 | 7 | #14,324 |
| 2006 | 1,734 | #215 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 1,689 | #214 | 16 | #7,234 |
| 2004 | 1,605 | #217 | 10 | #10,120 |
| 2003 | 1,780 | #205 | 8 | #11,604 |
| 2002 | 1,556 | #224 | 9 | #10,460 |
| 2001 | 1,110 | #276 | 6 | #14,027 |
| 2000 | 1,190 | #271 | 6 | #13,651 |
| 1999 | 1,134 | #265 | 7 | #11,721 |
| 1998 | 1,096 | #264 | 11 | #8,154 |
| 1997 | 1,097 | #258 | 7 | #11,173 |
| 1996 | 933 | #289 | 13 | #6,836 |
| 1995 | 882 | #302 | 13 | #6,755 |
| 1994 | 884 | #303 | 15 | #6,075 |
| 1993 | 905 | #302 | 5 | #14,097 |
| 1992 | 821 | #317 | 8 | #9,725 |
| 1991 | 643 | #366 | 6 | #11,916 |
| 1990 | 590 | #393 | 11 | #7,452 |
| 1989 | 551 | #395 | 8 | #8,971 |
| 1988 | 480 | #412 | 9 | #7,878 |
| 1987 | 423 | #427 | 8 | #8,203 |
| 1986 | 419 | #419 | 16 | #4,784 |
| 1985 | 423 | #413 | 7 | #8,586 |
| 1984 | 376 | #431 | 8 | #7,577 |
| 1983 | 312 | #476 | 7 | #8,271 |
| 1982 | 342 | #461 | 8 | #7,662 |
| 1981 | 326 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 322 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 322 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 320 | #443 | 8 | #7,114 |
| 1977 | 319 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 275 | #478 | 8 | #6,780 |
| 1975 | 291 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 253 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 266 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 277 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 253 | #513 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 301 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 335 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 282 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 256 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 315 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 307 | #440 | 6 | #5,985 |
| 1964 | 313 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 338 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 298 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 313 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 346 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 329 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 340 | #426 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 313 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 337 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 332 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 315 | #403 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 324 | #390 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 329 | #376 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 311 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 257 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 256 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 267 | #413 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 288 | #404 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 242 | #409 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 235 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 257 | #373 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 282 | #365 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 320 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 273 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 236 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 231 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 234 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 250 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 237 | #351 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 271 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 254 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 308 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 366 | #284 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 390 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 423 | #277 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 465 | #259 | 5 | #4,746 |
| 1928 | 474 | #260 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 501 | #255 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 465 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 538 | #244 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 579 | #235 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 580 | #227 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 548 | #239 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 575 | #232 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 564 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 489 | #238 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 594 | #210 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 508 | #218 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 567 | #201 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 521 | #208 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 424 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 325 | #204 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 275 | #203 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 119 | #235 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 93 | #249 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 91 | #228 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 62 | #272 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 62 | #266 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 44 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 31 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 28 | #392 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 34 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 19 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 29 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 25 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 31 | #317 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 17 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 23 | #394 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 15 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 15 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 18 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 15 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 11 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 9 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 12 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 14 | #504 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 6 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 7 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 5 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #808 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Dominick reached #197 in 1914. As a girl name, it reached #4,746 in 1929. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Dominick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.