Is Domingo a boy or girl name?
Domingo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 86 boys were named Domingo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 14,324 US babies named Domingo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,860
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Domingo since 1882
- 14,324
- Most popular year
- 1947
- 195 babies
Boys and girls named Domingo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 27 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 101 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 655 | 5 | 0.8% |
| 1920s | 1,392 | 6 | 0.4% |
| 1930s | 1,227 | 10 | 0.8% |
| 1940s | 1,591 | 5 | 0.3% |
| 1950s | 1,634 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,555 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,567 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,327 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,200 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 934 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 665 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 423 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 86 | #1,860 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 82 | #1,916 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 90 | #1,806 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 84 | #1,840 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 81 | #1,834 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 75 | #1,959 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 73 | #1,998 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 75 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 56 | #2,343 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 57 | #2,307 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 57 | #2,304 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 72 | #1,934 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 73 | #1,949 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 59 | #2,211 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 68 | #2,020 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 68 | #2,037 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 100 | #1,583 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 94 | #1,639 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 104 | #1,470 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 112 | #1,345 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 85 | #1,558 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 98 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 106 | #1,284 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 73 | #1,619 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 94 | #1,353 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 104 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 119 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 117 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 104 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 103 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 116 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 127 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 132 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 125 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 153 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 134 | #871 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 103 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 139 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 118 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 130 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 137 | #745 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 125 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 139 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 154 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 148 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 145 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 143 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 154 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 165 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 172 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 147 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 172 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 132 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 155 | #661 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 182 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 147 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 145 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 148 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 132 | #645 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 172 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 143 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 167 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 156 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 174 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 171 | #601 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 161 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 160 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 161 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 169 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 173 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 169 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 147 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 158 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 174 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 162 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 177 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 176 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 190 | #487 | 5 | #5,507 |
| 1946 | 190 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 137 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 174 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 156 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 123 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 146 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 122 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 141 | #480 | 5 | #4,405 |
| 1938 | 128 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 107 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 96 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 132 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 125 | #524 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 116 | #529 | 5 | #4,374 |
| 1932 | 108 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 135 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 139 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 141 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 164 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 152 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 122 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 142 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 148 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 114 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 145 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 141 | #525 | 6 | #4,611 |
| 1920 | 123 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 131 | #518 | 5 | #4,991 |
| 1918 | 113 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 113 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 97 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 77 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 27 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 33 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 20 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 20 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 24 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 23 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 13 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 14 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 8 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 11 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 11 | #735 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 12 | #666 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 9 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 9 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 5 | #976 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 7 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 6 | #866 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Domingo reached #460 in 1944. As a girl name, it reached #4,374 in 1933. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Domingo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.