Is Roseann a boy or girl name?
Roseann is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 15 girls and 0 boys were named Roseann, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 15,860 US babies named Roseann were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,500
- Babies named Roseann since 1905
- 15,860
- Most popular year
- 1943
- 555 babies
Boys and girls named Roseann, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 116 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 499 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,298 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 3,853 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 4,113 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,996 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,368 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 1,101 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 242 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 116 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 87 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 66 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,500 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,970 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,432 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,979 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,499 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,532 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,518 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,369 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,666 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,212 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,030 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,791 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,292 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,004 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 9 | #12,249 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,448 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,435 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,818 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,341 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,141 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,170 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,015 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,947 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,279 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,775 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,311 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,971 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,327 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,979 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,806 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,563 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,234 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,777 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,393 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,749 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,540 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,394 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,279 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,257 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,072 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,029 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,175 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,111 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,181 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,024 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,056 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,078 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,051 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 147 | #899 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 124 | #990 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,036 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 132 | #934 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 166 | #834 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 182 | #780 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 164 | #805 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 213 | #663 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 219 | #647 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 229 | #634 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 308 | #540 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 323 | #553 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 370 | #507 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 359 | #516 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 388 | #493 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 423 | #478 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 440 | #459 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 380 | #491 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 391 | #481 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 363 | #491 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 357 | #480 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 375 | #456 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 411 | #431 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 427 | #406 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 473 | #375 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 496 | #353 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 417 | #386 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 430 | #383 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 449 | #377 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 410 | #377 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 388 | #352 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 417 | #336 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 555 | #294 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 327 | #395 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 249 | #435 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 211 | #462 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 211 | #462 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 189 | #485 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 161 | #520 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 137 | #561 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 129 | #564 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 127 | #574 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 110 | #622 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 83 | #743 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 86 | #727 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 65 | #908 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 69 | #860 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 79 | #814 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 61 | #981 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,003 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,190 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,014 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,210 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,246 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,568 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,876 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,845 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,744 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,907 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,226 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,175 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,403 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,305 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,909 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,158 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,182 |
Highest rank
Roseann has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #294 in 1943. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roseann
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.