Is Rosella a boy or girl name?
Rosella is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 79 girls and 0 boys were named Rosella, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 15,914 US babies named Rosella were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,335
- Babies named Rosella since 1880
- 15,914
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 435 babies
Boys and girls named Rosella, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 254 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 502 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 960 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 2,847 | 100% |
| 1920s | 5 | 3,948 | 99.9% |
| 1930s | 0 | 2,681 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,546 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 906 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 522 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 318 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 203 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 170 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 238 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 471 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 343 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,335 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,282 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,021 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,703 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,652 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,810 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,897 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,735 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,368 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,583 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,265 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,766 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,516 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,034 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,478 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,259 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,918 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,646 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,928 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,193 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,717 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,206 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,633 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,247 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,079 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,425 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,309 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,211 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,998 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,647 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,921 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,368 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,573 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,913 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,770 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,488 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,011 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,097 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,735 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,585 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,679 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,782 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,323 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,131 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,929 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,007 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,917 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,892 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,381 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,134 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,893 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,053 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,045 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,637 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,149 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,129 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,591 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,723 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,905 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,590 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,574 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,414 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,390 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,480 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,392 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,190 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,274 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,299 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,218 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,039 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,178 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 97 | #972 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 110 | #882 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 108 | #866 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 132 | #753 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 119 | #796 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 117 | #798 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 166 | #647 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 147 | #654 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 138 | #620 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 147 | #609 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 163 | #591 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 171 | #565 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 178 | #523 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 200 | #483 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 226 | #447 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 223 | #452 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 220 | #444 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 247 | #409 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 268 | #392 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 255 | #411 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 275 | #389 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 295 | #380 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 309 | #366 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 363 | #344 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 335 | #364 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 360 | #363 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,694 | 392 | #337 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 426 | #321 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 377 | #348 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 435 | #320 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 382 | #336 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 410 | #323 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 425 | #318 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 406 | #322 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 374 | #329 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 420 | #313 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 398 | #308 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 387 | #307 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 357 | #311 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 237 | #343 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 225 | #320 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 186 | #334 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 140 | #335 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 123 | #359 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 117 | #335 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 119 | #324 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 112 | #331 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 106 | #329 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 83 | #375 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 93 | #338 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 84 | #345 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 72 | #376 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 80 | #343 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 94 | #343 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 46 | #432 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 79 | #350 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 55 | #394 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 47 | #422 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 53 | #389 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 61 | #358 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 41 | #428 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 53 | #368 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 34 | #438 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 33 | #459 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 30 | #452 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 38 | #402 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 28 | #420 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 22 | #474 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 29 | #385 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 27 | #388 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 25 | #371 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 18 | #443 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 12 | #500 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 25 | #325 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rosella reached #4,694 in 1927. As a girl name, it reached #307 in 1916. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rosella
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.