Is Jannie a boy or girl name?
Jannie was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 14,847 US babies named Jannie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jannie since 1880
- 14,847
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 281 babies
Boys and girls named Jannie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 257 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 547 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 879 | 100% |
| 1910s | 5 | 1,795 | 99.7% |
| 1920s | 17 | 2,478 | 99.3% |
| 1930s | 6 | 2,103 | 99.7% |
| 1940s | 0 | 2,540 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 2,017 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 901 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 421 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 337 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 231 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 184 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 110 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 19 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,546 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,191 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,844 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,677 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,496 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,247 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,598 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,481 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,540 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,266 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,592 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,059 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,486 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,197 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 13 | #9,227 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,936 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,014 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,929 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,018 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,206 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,139 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,863 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,504 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,854 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,998 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,887 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,823 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,594 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,914 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,436 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,255 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,463 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,781 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,666 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,784 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,533 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,762 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,808 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,691 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,789 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,284 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,554 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,284 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,589 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,274 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,116 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,331 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,922 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,991 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,733 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,983 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,790 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,470 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,635 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,215 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,217 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,020 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,062 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,205 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,107 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,067 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 137 | #899 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 137 | #889 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 146 | #847 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 178 | #745 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 190 | #697 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 220 | #627 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 218 | #615 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 205 | #619 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 229 | #572 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 241 | #542 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 253 | #511 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 264 | #499 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 258 | #510 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 266 | #508 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 246 | #497 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 241 | #461 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 265 | #443 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 257 | #461 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 261 | #460 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 239 | #443 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 243 | #436 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 216 | #453 |
| 1938 | 6 | #3,342 | 203 | #469 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 200 | #462 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 176 | #486 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 203 | #451 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 234 | #429 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 228 | #427 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 231 | #434 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 193 | #465 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 219 | #457 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 233 | #432 |
| 1928 | 7 | #3,525 | 233 | #446 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 256 | #432 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 271 | #414 |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,557 | 240 | #444 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 281 | #415 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 244 | #432 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 237 | #436 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 235 | #451 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,620 | 248 | #426 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 237 | #422 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 230 | #438 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 220 | #431 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 213 | #433 |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,097 | 216 | #406 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 156 | #436 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 139 | #419 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 123 | #422 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 119 | #371 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 142 | #322 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 112 | #341 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 89 | #384 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 113 | #326 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 76 | #394 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 100 | #341 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 77 | #374 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 68 | #385 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 83 | #349 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 56 | #393 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 105 | #331 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 54 | #392 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 78 | #353 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 67 | #356 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 56 | #379 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 59 | #369 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 60 | #361 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 44 | #406 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 48 | #385 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 28 | #489 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 53 | #352 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 34 | #418 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 44 | #363 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 24 | #462 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 41 | #335 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 24 | #435 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 23 | #421 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 18 | #456 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 19 | #422 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 9 | #603 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 21 | #357 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jannie reached #3,342 in 1938. As a girl name, it reached #322 in 1910. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jannie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.