Is Hiram a boy or girl name?
Hiram is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 93 boys were named Hiram, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 14,352 US babies named Hiram were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,763
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hiram since 1880
- 14,352
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 221 babies
Boys and girls named Hiram, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 825 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 544 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 433 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,410 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,830 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,120 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,043 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,202 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,106 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 989 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 765 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 712 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 890 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 974 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 509 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93 | #1,763 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 113 | #1,553 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 104 | #1,655 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 91 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 108 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 92 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 106 | #1,576 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 111 | #1,502 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 90 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 117 | #1,447 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 100 | #1,580 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 106 | #1,523 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 85 | #1,763 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 74 | #1,889 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 93 | #1,670 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 97 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 93 | #1,660 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 115 | #1,418 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 92 | #1,587 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 87 | #1,590 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 101 | #1,409 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 86 | #1,504 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 67 | #1,729 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 81 | #1,505 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 71 | #1,645 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 82 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 82 | #1,400 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 75 | #1,444 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 80 | #1,349 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 70 | #1,419 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 67 | #1,440 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 65 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 64 | #1,441 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 59 | #1,489 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 68 | #1,355 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 68 | #1,332 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 72 | #1,194 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 65 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 77 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 78 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 73 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 83 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 78 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 87 | #967 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 84 | #983 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 111 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 81 | #965 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 96 | #866 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 106 | #811 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 103 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 96 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 103 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 98 | #812 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 95 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 100 | #811 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 114 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 87 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 97 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 85 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 106 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 125 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 128 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 128 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 113 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 123 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 107 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 143 | #645 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 129 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 126 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 111 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 121 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 116 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 134 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 105 | #681 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 110 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 107 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 109 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 104 | #679 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 87 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 90 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 113 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 109 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 114 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 95 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 115 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 89 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 99 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 100 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 111 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 104 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 104 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 108 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 139 | #487 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 120 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 146 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 150 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 174 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 138 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 194 | #435 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 170 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 186 | #447 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 210 | #413 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 200 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 187 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 221 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 211 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 205 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 181 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 185 | #408 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 161 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 131 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 131 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 90 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 57 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 58 | #324 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 38 | #401 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 54 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 37 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 36 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 54 | #269 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 44 | #289 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 33 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 42 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 38 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 57 | #271 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 44 | #252 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 55 | #236 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 44 | #263 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 46 | #268 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 62 | #221 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 61 | #216 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 51 | #243 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 64 | #220 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 49 | #232 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 68 | #196 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 66 | #198 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 70 | #209 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 75 | #170 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 53 | #232 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 92 | #147 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 97 | #143 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 85 | #153 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 104 | #135 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 95 | #124 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 88 | #155 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hiram reached #124 in 1881. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.