Is Irwin a boy or girl name?
Irwin is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 17 boys were named Irwin, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 15,946 US babies named Irwin were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,510
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Irwin since 1880
- 15,946
- Most popular year
- 1925
- 534 babies
Boys and girls named Irwin, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 223 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 258 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 337 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 1,902 | 5 | 0.3% |
| 1920s | 4,433 | 7 | 0.2% |
| 1930s | 3,602 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,851 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,139 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 576 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 264 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 309 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 420 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 364 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 185 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 71 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | #5,510 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 6 | #11,362 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 13 | #6,612 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 16 | #5,633 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 19 | #4,922 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 20 | #4,866 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 20 | #4,816 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 12 | #6,856 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 16 | #5,647 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 18 | #5,148 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 12 | #6,798 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 9 | #8,367 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 26 | #3,941 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 27 | #3,831 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 25 | #4,037 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 18 | #5,175 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 32 | #3,448 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 47 | #2,620 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 44 | #2,676 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 30 | #3,343 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 40 | #2,664 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 36 | #2,750 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 43 | #2,391 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 36 | #2,646 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 38 | #2,496 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 36 | #2,490 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 35 | #2,476 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 32 | #2,516 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 41 | #2,086 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 37 | #2,190 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 34 | #2,325 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 44 | #1,881 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 56 | #1,588 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 61 | #1,456 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 44 | #1,792 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 50 | #1,596 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 43 | #1,655 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 21 | #2,592 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 19 | #2,721 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 30 | #1,935 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 40 | #1,543 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 23 | #2,237 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 21 | #2,370 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 32 | #1,785 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 30 | #1,882 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 26 | #2,014 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 17 | #2,604 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 22 | #2,155 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 26 | #1,901 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 29 | #1,725 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 32 | #1,558 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 28 | #1,672 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 19 | #2,110 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 31 | #1,575 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 34 | #1,445 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 41 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 38 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 34 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 44 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 57 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 65 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 66 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 56 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 88 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 87 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 85 | #826 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 81 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 100 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 104 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 107 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 120 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 113 | #675 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 139 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 144 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 146 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 138 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 150 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 179 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 175 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 186 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 168 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 187 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 232 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 207 | #406 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 229 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 245 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 233 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 289 | #317 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 368 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 382 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 364 | #281 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 368 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 399 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 468 | #245 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 486 | #254 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 499 | #247 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 508 | #249 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 519 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 463 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 527 | #247 | 7 | #4,205 |
| 1924 | 487 | #259 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 406 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 362 | #299 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 329 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 333 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 308 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 292 | #335 | 5 | #5,170 |
| 1917 | 254 | #352 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 244 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 261 | #325 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 187 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 125 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 126 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 56 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 49 | #368 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 53 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 43 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 30 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 38 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 30 | #386 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 40 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 24 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 23 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 24 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 32 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 26 | #357 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 38 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 33 | #324 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 27 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 39 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 21 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 20 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 23 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 14 | #487 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 17 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 22 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 18 | #454 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 21 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 18 | #422 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 12 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 34 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 28 | #314 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 20 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 28 | #308 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 22 | #366 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Irwin reached #245 in 1931. As a girl name, it reached #4,205 in 1925. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.