Is Domenick a boy or girl name?
Domenick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 17 boys were named Domenick, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 5,192 US babies named Domenick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,488
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Domenick since 1902
- 5,192
- Most popular year
- 1925
- 103 babies
Boys and girls named Domenick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 53 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 518 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 876 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 489 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 394 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 440 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 410 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 306 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 309 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 473 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 518 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 308 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 98 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | #5,488 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 22 | #4,631 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 16 | #5,687 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 22 | #4,526 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 21 | #4,578 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 15 | #5,888 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 21 | #4,641 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 22 | #4,505 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 26 | #4,021 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 31 | #3,536 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 31 | #3,478 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 24 | #4,092 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 37 | #3,067 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 55 | #2,326 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 46 | #2,650 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 60 | #2,207 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 50 | #2,525 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 51 | #2,481 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 59 | #2,188 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 51 | #2,304 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 55 | #2,138 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 65 | #1,820 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 46 | #2,261 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 46 | #2,226 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 35 | #2,639 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 56 | #1,783 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 40 | #2,244 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 47 | #1,936 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 49 | #1,849 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 47 | #1,847 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 54 | #1,674 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 63 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 45 | #1,822 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 43 | #1,840 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 29 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 31 | #2,210 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 38 | #1,793 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 35 | #1,837 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 32 | #1,884 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 29 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 33 | #1,737 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 35 | #1,663 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 17 | #2,738 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 31 | #1,825 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 28 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 27 | #1,958 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 30 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 29 | #1,794 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 29 | #1,756 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 30 | #1,671 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 28 | #1,713 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 31 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 33 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 40 | #1,336 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 29 | #1,587 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 33 | #1,400 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 44 | #1,136 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 36 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 43 | #1,138 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 46 | #1,096 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 44 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 37 | #1,284 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 45 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 32 | #1,413 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 50 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 45 | #1,160 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 58 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 58 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 33 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 43 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 37 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 36 | #1,248 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 43 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 40 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 47 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 57 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 45 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 40 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 29 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 36 | #1,089 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 25 | #1,340 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 36 | #1,144 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 46 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 40 | #1,022 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 40 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 38 | #1,038 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 38 | #1,050 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 47 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 34 | #1,123 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 53 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 40 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 50 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 53 | #879 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 67 | #763 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 69 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 73 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 92 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 87 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 95 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 103 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 97 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 74 | #765 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 86 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 83 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 86 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 74 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 64 | #819 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 71 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 75 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 72 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 46 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 42 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 40 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 19 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 15 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 9 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,151 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 13 | #673 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,259 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,184 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Domenick reached #618 in 1925. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Domenick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.