Is Rubie a boy or girl name?
Rubie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 46 girls and 0 boys were named Rubie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.1% of the 5,279 US babies named Rubie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,431
- Babies named Rubie since 1884
- 5,279
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 156 babies
Boys and girls named Rubie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 60 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 196 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 353 | 100% |
| 1910s | 22 | 891 | 97.6% |
| 1920s | 18 | 1,152 | 98.5% |
| 1930s | 6 | 601 | 99% |
| 1940s | 0 | 364 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 208 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 96 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 101 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 195 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 330 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 394 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 230 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,431 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,512 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,877 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,599 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,879 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,903 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,428 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,056 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,837 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,520 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,434 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,632 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,571 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,330 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,803 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,725 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,338 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,278 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,664 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,860 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,806 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,186 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,156 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,334 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,119 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,058 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,542 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,755 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,001 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,390 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,216 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,882 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,814 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,454 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,388 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,987 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,184 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,953 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,320 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,832 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,741 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,956 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,894 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,972 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,733 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,905 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,233 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,468 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,339 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,732 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,451 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,440 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,016 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,116 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,785 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,200 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,303 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,603 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,136 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,298 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,482 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,782 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,820 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,806 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,607 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,903 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,179 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,500 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,772 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,236 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,175 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,655 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,061 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,507 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,674 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,153 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,427 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,518 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,383 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,085 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,076 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,062 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 60 | #921 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,031 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,035 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 57 | #923 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 74 | #786 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 61 | #864 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 69 | #829 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 64 | #866 |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,937 | 76 | #816 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 89 | #745 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 94 | #734 |
| 1927 | 7 | #3,720 | 89 | #770 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 98 | #734 |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,770 | 113 | #696 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 121 | #679 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 132 | #641 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 130 | #645 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 156 | #580 |
| 1920 | 6 | #4,202 | 130 | #632 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 125 | #630 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 126 | #630 |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,472 | 108 | #655 |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,407 | 118 | #625 |
| 1915 | 7 | #3,343 | 96 | #673 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 86 | #623 |
| 1913 | 5 | #3,188 | 60 | #673 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 65 | #613 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 51 | #601 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 56 | #548 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 52 | #529 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 37 | #638 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 42 | #570 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 44 | #526 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 28 | #680 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 21 | #803 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 38 | #526 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 31 | #599 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 27 | #613 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 33 | #621 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 24 | #641 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 27 | #630 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 23 | #659 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 22 | #684 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 14 | #888 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 25 | #594 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 20 | #655 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,010 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 13 | #787 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 18 | #640 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 14 | #717 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 20 | #569 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 10 | #785 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,179 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 11 | #674 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rubie reached #3,188 in 1913. As a girl name, it reached #526 in 1903. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rubie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.