Is Eldridge a boy or girl name?
Eldridge is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 10 boys were named Eldridge, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 5,241 US babies named Eldridge were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #7,883
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Eldridge since 1880
- 5,241
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 120 babies
Boys and girls named Eldridge, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 85 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 108 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 139 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 655 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,004 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 675 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 639 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 559 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 419 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 396 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 200 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 147 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 91 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 78 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 46 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 | #7,883 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 8 | #9,146 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 13 | #6,574 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 9 | #8,355 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 6 | #10,996 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 14 | #6,181 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 9 | #8,344 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 8 | #9,081 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 6 | #11,111 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 5 | #12,602 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 9 | #8,330 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 7 | #9,955 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,201 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 8 | #8,985 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 6 | #11,146 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,350 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 11 | #7,236 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 11 | #7,060 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 8 | #8,515 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 10 | #7,130 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,062 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 12 | #5,831 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 13 | #5,463 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 7 | #8,461 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 17 | #4,205 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 9 | #6,470 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 12 | #5,049 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 10 | #5,656 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 15 | #4,115 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 12 | #4,880 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 18 | #3,543 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 13 | #4,398 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 20 | #3,152 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 21 | #2,992 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 20 | #3,013 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 14 | #3,581 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 14 | #3,390 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 15 | #3,179 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 18 | #2,748 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 16 | #2,857 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 32 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 34 | #1,710 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 14 | #3,085 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 23 | #2,240 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 33 | #1,725 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 33 | #1,664 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 46 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 38 | #1,459 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 37 | #1,462 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 37 | #1,423 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 37 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 33 | #1,480 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 50 | #1,160 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 52 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 50 | #1,102 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 37 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 35 | #1,276 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 41 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 52 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 40 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 47 | #1,131 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 32 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 43 | #1,208 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 42 | #1,213 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 51 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 58 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 54 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 58 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 62 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 56 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 55 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 57 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 52 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 56 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 64 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 60 | #880 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 75 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 52 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 69 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 67 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 41 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 72 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 66 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 73 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 61 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 60 | #801 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 65 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 68 | #733 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 72 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 60 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 74 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 74 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 59 | #819 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 82 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 95 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 92 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 109 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 115 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 95 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 120 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 85 | #701 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 87 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 102 | #634 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 104 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 89 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 94 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 94 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 81 | #651 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 84 | #634 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 66 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 54 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 55 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 22 | #675 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 16 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 22 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 18 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 11 | #830 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 18 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 14 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 7 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 12 | #667 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 12 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 17 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 7 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 9 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 11 | #659 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 11 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 14 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 20 | #424 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 9 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 12 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 9 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 8 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 6 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 10 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 10 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 8 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #888 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 9 | #666 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 9 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 13 | #508 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Eldridge reached #424 in 1894. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eldridge
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.