Is Rupert a boy or girl name?
Rupert is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 29 boys were named Rupert, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 5,583 US babies named Rupert were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,863
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rupert since 1880
- 5,583
- Most popular year
- 1920
- 161 babies
Boys and girls named Rupert, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 107 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 167 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 181 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 881 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,185 | 10 | 0.8% |
| 1930s | 732 | 6 | 0.8% |
| 1940s | 569 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 465 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 346 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 218 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 183 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 137 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 109 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 164 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 123 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29 | #3,863 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 26 | #4,192 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 18 | #5,390 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 26 | #4,102 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 24 | #4,248 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 22 | #4,613 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 13 | #6,632 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 27 | #3,964 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 15 | #5,997 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 22 | #4,519 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 16 | #5,667 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 13 | #6,546 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 13 | #6,575 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 8 | #9,437 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 15 | #5,978 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 8 | #9,698 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 12 | #7,108 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 11 | #7,489 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 8 | #9,401 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 14 | #5,821 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 12 | #6,445 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 10 | #7,141 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 14 | #5,341 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 7 | #9,039 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 13 | #5,521 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 12 | #5,587 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 12 | #5,402 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 12 | #5,213 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 15 | #4,354 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 11 | #5,435 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 8 | #6,856 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 10 | #5,695 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 19 | #3,438 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 27 | #2,592 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 11 | #4,931 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 23 | #2,764 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 10 | #4,720 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 22 | #2,541 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 18 | #2,866 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 13 | #3,565 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 14 | #3,247 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 25 | #2,133 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 23 | #2,256 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 21 | #2,400 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 14 | #3,220 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 18 | #2,657 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 10 | #3,801 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 21 | #2,256 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 25 | #1,986 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,935 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 21 | #2,113 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 23 | #1,920 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 28 | #1,675 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 24 | #1,855 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 23 | #1,885 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 26 | #1,635 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 20 | #1,821 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 30 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 21 | #1,718 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 40 | #1,220 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 33 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 42 | #1,215 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 43 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 41 | #1,247 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 50 | #1,114 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 34 | #1,356 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 32 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 49 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 36 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 54 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 39 | #1,210 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 43 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 63 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 61 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 54 | #945 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 53 | #956 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 70 | #818 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 51 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 45 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 62 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 48 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 66 | #814 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 60 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 58 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 56 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 53 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 61 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 54 | #834 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 93 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 77 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 68 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 72 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 82 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 93 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 79 | #703 | 6 | #4,486 |
| 1929 | 86 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 98 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 104 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 99 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 122 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 108 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 141 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 132 | #549 | 5 | #5,667 |
| 1921 | 139 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 156 | #487 | 5 | #5,641 |
| 1919 | 113 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 138 | #510 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 117 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 107 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 117 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 91 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 66 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 69 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 30 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 33 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 21 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 17 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 21 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 21 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 20 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 20 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 12 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 9 | #851 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 13 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 27 | #441 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 21 | #413 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 22 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 17 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 20 | #456 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 15 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 19 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 15 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 16 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 16 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 11 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 11 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 12 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 11 | #596 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 11 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 15 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 9 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 11 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 10 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 6 | #892 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rupert reached #413 in 1899. As a girl name, it reached #4,486 in 1930. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rupert
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.