Is Hobert a boy or girl name?
Hobert was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 5,724 US babies named Hobert were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hobert since 1893
- 5,724
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 185 babies
Boys and girls named Hobert, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 189 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 202 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 826 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,523 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,021 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 773 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 508 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 337 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 193 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 100 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 5 | #11,216 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 6 | #9,538 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 5 | #10,529 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 5 | #9,384 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 6 | #8,143 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 11 | #5,012 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 6 | #7,635 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 8 | #6,052 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 13 | #4,129 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 6 | #6,734 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 13 | #3,608 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 9 | #4,617 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 7 | #5,383 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 14 | #3,170 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 9 | #4,282 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 12 | #3,568 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 10 | #3,959 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 7 | #5,159 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 16 | #2,823 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 10 | #3,697 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 16 | #2,708 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 17 | #2,545 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 16 | #2,577 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 22 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 15 | #2,549 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 27 | #1,703 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 27 | #1,723 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 27 | #1,675 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 31 | #1,451 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 30 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 28 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 31 | #1,384 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 39 | #1,228 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 37 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 31 | #1,413 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 32 | #1,393 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 31 | #1,446 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 47 | #1,142 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 39 | #1,252 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 45 | #1,150 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 40 | #1,237 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 50 | #1,075 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 50 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 56 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 52 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 56 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 66 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 54 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 48 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 67 | #832 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 81 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 70 | #796 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 69 | #739 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 92 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 82 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 100 | #638 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 80 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 84 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 64 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 96 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 85 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 81 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 108 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 95 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 108 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 125 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 126 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 133 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 118 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 134 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 144 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 116 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 156 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 171 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 166 | #474 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 185 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 165 | #478 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 168 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 167 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 153 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 120 | #530 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 106 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 106 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 43 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 48 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 38 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 26 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 19 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 21 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 23 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 18 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 22 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 20 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 15 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 20 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 11 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 36 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 22 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 42 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 60 | #216 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 47 | #263 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 8 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 5 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,114 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hobert reached #216 in 1897. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Hobert
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.