Is Hubert a boy or girl name?
Hubert is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 32 boys were named Hubert, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 57,727 US babies named Hubert were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,542
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hubert since 1880
- 57,727
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 1,551 babies
Boys and girls named Hubert, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 634 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 1,062 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 1,771 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 9,597 | 44 | 0.5% |
| 1920s | 14,696 | 77 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 9,819 | 46 | 0.5% |
| 1940s | 7,097 | 22 | 0.3% |
| 1950s | 5,270 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 3,091 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,740 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,090 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 634 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 495 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 388 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 154 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32 | #3,542 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 23 | #4,511 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 30 | #3,721 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 29 | #3,766 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 40 | #2,947 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 26 | #4,047 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 30 | #3,647 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 36 | #3,212 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 38 | #3,082 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 37 | #3,105 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 48 | #2,557 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 32 | #3,362 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 45 | #2,693 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 47 | #2,604 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 49 | #2,527 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 37 | #3,127 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 48 | #2,602 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 52 | #2,457 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 53 | #2,362 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 57 | #2,144 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 52 | #2,220 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 46 | #2,326 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 49 | #2,169 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 46 | #2,227 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 55 | #1,904 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 45 | #2,114 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 48 | #1,999 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 55 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 65 | #1,540 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 61 | #1,553 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 55 | #1,651 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 60 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 82 | #1,252 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 81 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 82 | #1,210 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 98 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 90 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 81 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 92 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 110 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 107 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 96 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 141 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 122 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 153 | #702 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 124 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 141 | #707 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 161 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 148 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 160 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 155 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 182 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 182 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 242 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 245 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 235 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 258 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 258 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 276 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 306 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 338 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 341 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 309 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 370 | #412 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 400 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 422 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 491 | #345 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 482 | #343 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 484 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 536 | #318 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 508 | #319 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 561 | #298 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 563 | #296 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 620 | #272 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 603 | #269 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 625 | #259 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 653 | #253 | 6 | #4,884 |
| 1947 | 732 | #241 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 681 | #230 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 610 | #222 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 760 | #197 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 756 | #207 | 5 | #4,951 |
| 1942 | 787 | #201 | 6 | #4,317 |
| 1941 | 731 | #196 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 762 | #187 | 5 | #4,636 |
| 1939 | 783 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 825 | #178 | 7 | #3,633 |
| 1937 | 893 | #164 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 891 | #161 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 905 | #160 | 8 | #3,278 |
| 1934 | 1,000 | #150 | 6 | #4,011 |
| 1933 | 929 | #155 | 7 | #3,560 |
| 1932 | 1,087 | #146 | 5 | #4,689 |
| 1931 | 1,229 | #137 | 7 | #3,653 |
| 1930 | 1,277 | #137 | 6 | #4,262 |
| 1929 | 1,384 | #124 | 15 | #2,239 |
| 1928 | 1,488 | #121 | 14 | #2,444 |
| 1927 | 1,376 | #128 | 12 | #2,774 |
| 1926 | 1,320 | #131 | 8 | #3,713 |
| 1925 | 1,461 | #124 | 10 | #3,216 |
| 1924 | 1,551 | #115 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 1,533 | #117 | 8 | #3,772 |
| 1922 | 1,527 | #116 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 1,548 | #115 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 1,508 | #113 | 10 | #3,209 |
| 1919 | 1,416 | #115 | 7 | #4,018 |
| 1918 | 1,454 | #114 | 7 | #4,050 |
| 1917 | 1,338 | #115 | 10 | #2,967 |
| 1916 | 1,348 | #113 | 9 | #3,132 |
| 1915 | 1,195 | #116 | 5 | #4,577 |
| 1914 | 932 | #118 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 765 | #112 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 544 | #122 | 6 | #2,776 |
| 1911 | 316 | #119 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 289 | #106 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 222 | #124 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 203 | #124 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 184 | #129 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 162 | #129 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 163 | #136 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 173 | #124 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 170 | #115 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 165 | #117 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 140 | #119 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 189 | #123 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 125 | #129 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 114 | #149 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 123 | #132 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 119 | #139 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 106 | #146 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 105 | #144 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 107 | #139 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 86 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 92 | #144 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 85 | #166 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 83 | #162 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 75 | #201 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 78 | #161 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 61 | #217 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 72 | #181 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 61 | #214 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 53 | #207 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 49 | #239 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 43 | #236 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 59 | #207 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hubert reached #106 in 1910. As a girl name, it reached #2,239 in 1929. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Hubert
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.