Is Hardy a boy or girl name?
Hardy is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 52 boys were named Hardy, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 5,775 US babies named Hardy were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,566
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hardy since 1880
- 5,775
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 151 babies
Boys and girls named Hardy, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 191 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 194 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 188 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 549 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 958 | 5 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 598 | 5 | 0.8% |
| 1940s | 737 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 554 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 432 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 268 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 193 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 160 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 312 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 244 | 7 | 2.8% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 52 | #2,566 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 39 | #3,136 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 63 | #2,275 | 7 | #12,716 |
| 2021 | 52 | #2,534 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 38 | #3,039 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 37 | #3,161 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 35 | #3,263 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 32 | #3,474 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 48 | #2,599 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 43 | #2,781 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 32 | #3,407 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 20 | #4,686 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 28 | #3,742 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 20 | #4,720 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 17 | #5,334 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 22 | #4,484 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 13 | #6,536 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 13 | #6,391 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 28 | #3,635 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 20 | #4,376 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 15 | #5,344 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 20 | #4,170 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 22 | #3,842 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 17 | #4,561 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 10 | #6,496 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 12 | #5,436 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 10 | #5,991 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 9 | #6,276 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 14 | #4,471 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 13 | #4,622 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 23 | #3,055 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 17 | #3,718 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 25 | #2,767 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 14 | #4,086 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 23 | #2,812 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 13 | #4,123 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 19 | #2,896 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 23 | #2,421 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 13 | #3,518 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 19 | #2,637 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 20 | #2,470 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 16 | #2,835 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 23 | #2,226 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 26 | #2,059 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 21 | #2,394 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 22 | #2,264 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 23 | #2,098 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 12 | #3,276 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 24 | #2,020 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 32 | #1,604 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 25 | #1,856 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 24 | #1,843 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 37 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 33 | #1,505 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 36 | #1,403 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 31 | #1,450 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 34 | #1,327 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 33 | #1,322 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 39 | #1,206 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 40 | #1,212 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 50 | #1,075 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 47 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 43 | #1,192 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 62 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 53 | #1,062 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 49 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 49 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 53 | #1,044 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 45 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 55 | #1,018 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 54 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 65 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 60 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 70 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 54 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 86 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 59 | #895 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 72 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 77 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 71 | #730 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 73 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 75 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 85 | #700 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 77 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 62 | #790 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 59 | #796 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 51 | #874 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 70 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 57 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 63 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 57 | #832 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 54 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 67 | #773 | 5 | #4,681 |
| 1931 | 61 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 59 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 72 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 72 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 72 | #776 | 5 | #5,134 |
| 1926 | 73 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 83 | #712 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 67 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 118 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 139 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 151 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 111 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 84 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 68 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 73 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 67 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 55 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 68 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 45 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 33 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 30 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 26 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 29 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 28 | #469 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 19 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 17 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 8 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 14 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 18 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 14 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 15 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 26 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 15 | #510 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 23 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 12 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 20 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 18 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 19 | #447 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 27 | #342 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 20 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 13 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 27 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 25 | #354 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 24 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 26 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 15 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 19 | #420 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 14 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 26 | #348 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 16 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 19 | #396 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hardy reached #334 in 1886. As a girl name, it reached #4,681 in 1932. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.