Is Walton a boy or girl name?
Walton is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 36 boys were named Walton, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 5,843 US babies named Walton were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,315
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Walton since 1880
- 5,843
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 156 babies
Boys and girls named Walton, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 80 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 119 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 134 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 824 | 5 | 0.6% |
| 1920s | 1,094 | 5 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 743 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 702 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 568 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 349 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 273 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 184 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 157 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 187 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 239 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36 | #3,315 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 38 | #3,223 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 30 | #3,766 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 34 | #3,421 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 42 | #2,882 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 28 | #3,895 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 41 | #2,937 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 26 | #4,099 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 29 | #3,769 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 23 | #4,396 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 22 | #4,524 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 28 | #3,745 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 20 | #4,849 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 14 | #6,237 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 8 | #9,641 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 15 | #6,073 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 17 | #5,478 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 17 | #5,421 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 22 | #4,363 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 15 | #5,563 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 24 | #3,856 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 29 | #3,271 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 17 | #4,697 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 16 | #4,882 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 15 | #5,030 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 19 | #3,977 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 18 | #4,008 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 16 | #4,237 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 10 | #5,964 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 19 | #3,554 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 18 | #3,745 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 11 | #5,344 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 14 | #4,312 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 17 | #3,625 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 15 | #3,961 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 17 | #3,442 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 18 | #3,072 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 21 | #2,635 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 19 | #2,775 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 20 | #2,596 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 14 | #3,265 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 22 | #2,337 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 21 | #2,423 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 15 | #3,022 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 17 | #2,827 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 25 | #2,100 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 26 | #1,962 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 16 | #2,786 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 34 | #1,604 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 32 | #1,627 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 21 | #2,124 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 22 | #1,977 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 24 | #1,870 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 36 | #1,441 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 37 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 30 | #1,491 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 24 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 37 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 32 | #1,370 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 35 | #1,317 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 32 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 32 | #1,400 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 27 | #1,543 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 58 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 42 | #1,226 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 40 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 47 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 55 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 49 | #1,092 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 56 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 69 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 60 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 52 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 73 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 67 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 61 | #884 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 57 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 77 | #786 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 71 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 59 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 86 | #673 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 83 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 73 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 73 | #728 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 62 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 66 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 61 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 66 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 71 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 74 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 68 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 93 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 80 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 86 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 78 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 81 | #688 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 79 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 85 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 106 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 97 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 111 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 134 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 151 | #505 | 5 | #5,763 |
| 1921 | 128 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 122 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 124 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 114 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 120 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 105 | #561 | 5 | #5,141 |
| 1915 | 124 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 87 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 53 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 50 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 24 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 23 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 17 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 17 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 12 | #811 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 14 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 13 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 10 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 14 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 12 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 15 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 9 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 11 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 10 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 14 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 18 | #478 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 12 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 10 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 12 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 12 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 5 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 12 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 14 | #495 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 8 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 10 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 7 | #805 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Walton reached #478 in 1892. As a girl name, it reached #5,141 in 1916. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Walton
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.