Is Alvis a boy or girl name?
Alvis is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 13 boys were named Alvis, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 5.9% of the 5,518 US babies named Alvis were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #6,459
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Alvis since 1881
- 5,518
- Most popular year
- 1924
- 113 babies
Boys and girls named Alvis, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 46 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 73 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 105 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 645 | 61 | 8.6% |
| 1920s | 916 | 79 | 7.9% |
| 1930s | 783 | 79 | 9.2% |
| 1940s | 743 | 46 | 5.8% |
| 1950s | 658 | 51 | 7.2% |
| 1960s | 374 | 5 | 1.3% |
| 1970s | 265 | 5 | 1.9% |
| 1980s | 199 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 129 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 75 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 121 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 60 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | #6,459 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 14 | #6,232 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 12 | #6,840 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 13 | #6,346 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 8 | #8,769 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 11 | #7,199 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 19 | #4,926 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 13 | #6,350 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 12 | #6,739 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 20 | #4,721 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,075 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 12 | #6,623 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 13 | #6,322 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 10 | #7,523 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 7 | #9,908 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 14 | #6,084 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 7 | #9,825 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,019 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 8 | #8,329 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 7 | #8,696 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 11 | #6,105 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 7 | #8,377 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 5 | #10,424 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 5 | #9,979 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 12 | #5,166 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 11 | #5,296 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 12 | #4,894 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 12 | #4,799 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 13 | #4,546 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 15 | #4,022 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 13 | #4,332 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 16 | #3,642 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 20 | #3,060 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 16 | #3,457 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 19 | #2,861 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 13 | #3,530 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 23 | #2,364 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 14 | #3,221 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 15 | #2,958 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 18 | #2,583 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 17 | #2,711 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 31 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 33 | #1,728 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 20 | #2,382 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 31 | #1,720 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 26 | #1,906 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 20 | #2,247 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 33 | #1,560 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 26 | #1,792 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 16 | #2,407 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 26 | #1,725 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 32 | #1,527 | 5 | #8,365 |
| 1970 | 35 | #1,417 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 24 | #1,682 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 30 | #1,430 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 33 | #1,313 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 42 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 42 | #1,163 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 28 | #1,488 | 5 | #6,790 |
| 1963 | 48 | #1,101 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 40 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 37 | #1,302 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 50 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 55 | #1,033 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 60 | #978 | 5 | #6,121 |
| 1957 | 71 | #898 | 6 | #5,388 |
| 1956 | 76 | #860 | 7 | #4,846 |
| 1955 | 52 | #1,046 | 6 | #5,230 |
| 1954 | 73 | #851 | 6 | #5,167 |
| 1953 | 74 | #833 | 8 | #4,240 |
| 1952 | 54 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 77 | #803 | 8 | #4,022 |
| 1950 | 66 | #837 | 5 | #5,318 |
| 1949 | 60 | #886 | 5 | #5,260 |
| 1948 | 69 | #822 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 75 | #794 | 5 | #5,323 |
| 1946 | 76 | #759 | 5 | #4,977 |
| 1945 | 89 | #640 | 5 | #4,577 |
| 1944 | 77 | #707 | 5 | #4,595 |
| 1943 | 70 | #781 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 77 | #732 | 9 | #3,198 |
| 1941 | 74 | #719 | 6 | #3,970 |
| 1940 | 76 | #694 | 6 | #3,876 |
| 1939 | 69 | #717 | 8 | #3,156 |
| 1938 | 81 | #667 | 5 | #4,361 |
| 1937 | 71 | #712 | 6 | #3,818 |
| 1936 | 59 | #796 | 11 | #2,527 |
| 1935 | 82 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 79 | #682 | 11 | #2,573 |
| 1933 | 74 | #694 | 10 | #2,692 |
| 1932 | 90 | #626 | 10 | #2,837 |
| 1931 | 89 | #630 | 9 | #2,986 |
| 1930 | 89 | #654 | 9 | #3,068 |
| 1929 | 81 | #684 | 8 | #3,402 |
| 1928 | 80 | #708 | 5 | #4,743 |
| 1927 | 93 | #660 | 11 | #2,866 |
| 1926 | 87 | #678 | 8 | #3,581 |
| 1925 | 82 | #715 | 12 | #2,781 |
| 1924 | 101 | #638 | 12 | #2,812 |
| 1923 | 99 | #645 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 96 | #653 | 5 | #5,044 |
| 1921 | 99 | #647 | 9 | #3,414 |
| 1920 | 98 | #635 | 9 | #3,346 |
| 1919 | 81 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 88 | #658 | 7 | #3,886 |
| 1917 | 87 | #636 | 9 | #3,107 |
| 1916 | 78 | #671 | 14 | #2,252 |
| 1915 | 97 | #577 | 8 | #3,145 |
| 1914 | 71 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 58 | #573 | 8 | #2,338 |
| 1912 | 53 | #552 | 5 | #2,994 |
| 1911 | 22 | #669 | 10 | #1,547 |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 18 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 14 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 13 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 11 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 13 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 9 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 9 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 7 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 12 | #642 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 13 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 10 | #673 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 7 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 9 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #847 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 11 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 9 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 7 | #759 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 7 | #711 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Alvis reached #552 in 1912. As a girl name, it reached #1,547 in 1911. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Alvis
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.