Is Domenico a boy or girl name?
Domenico is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 41 boys were named Domenico, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 3,773 US babies named Domenico were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,001
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Domenico since 1906
- 3,773
- Most popular year
- 1974
- 70 babies
Boys and girls named Domenico, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 241 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 195 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 63 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 52 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 97 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 322 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 507 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 376 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 491 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 575 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 559 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 279 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41 | #3,001 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 50 | #2,622 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 65 | #2,220 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 59 | #2,326 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 64 | #2,166 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 55 | #2,432 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 51 | #2,518 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 53 | #2,426 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 55 | #2,370 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 60 | #2,238 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 62 | #2,182 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 49 | #2,497 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 56 | #2,300 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 67 | #2,024 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 51 | #2,438 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 54 | #2,385 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 70 | #2,010 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 55 | #2,346 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 54 | #2,325 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 62 | #2,012 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 58 | #2,057 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 57 | #2,014 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 48 | #2,204 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 58 | #1,896 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 59 | #1,820 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 57 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 47 | #2,022 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 57 | #1,711 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 36 | #2,263 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 60 | #1,565 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 44 | #1,902 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 45 | #1,855 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 49 | #1,734 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 47 | #1,726 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 49 | #1,667 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 35 | #2,040 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 35 | #1,888 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 34 | #1,873 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 43 | #1,544 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 39 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 32 | #1,772 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 33 | #1,721 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 42 | #1,493 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 28 | #1,960 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 55 | #1,243 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 49 | #1,325 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 45 | #1,374 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 37 | #1,521 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 45 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 45 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 70 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 51 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 54 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 65 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 46 | #1,228 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 48 | #1,129 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 32 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 47 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 35 | #1,289 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 33 | #1,339 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 31 | #1,414 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 31 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 26 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 22 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 17 | #1,991 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 21 | #1,771 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 17 | #1,970 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 18 | #1,904 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 14 | #2,192 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 10 | #2,627 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 8 | #2,972 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 9 | #2,726 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 8 | #2,848 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 5 | #3,806 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 9 | #2,575 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,551 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 6 | #3,309 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 7 | #3,005 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 7 | #2,945 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,582 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 7 | #2,901 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 15 | #1,823 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 11 | #2,256 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 7 | #3,156 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 17 | #1,788 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,686 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 12 | #2,352 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 19 | #1,779 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 19 | #1,821 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,205 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 16 | #2,030 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 22 | #1,688 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 27 | #1,436 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 25 | #1,517 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 21 | #1,721 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 26 | #1,470 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 21 | #1,643 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 25 | #1,457 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 41 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 34 | #1,126 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 31 | #1,165 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 27 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 28 | #935 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 10 | #1,651 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 11 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 13 | #882 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 6 | #1,256 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 10 | #807 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Domenico reached #807 in 1906. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Domenico
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.