Is Domenic a boy or girl name?
Domenic is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 59 boys were named Domenic, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 11,006 US babies named Domenic were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,372
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Domenic since 1904
- 11,006
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 219 babies
Boys and girls named Domenic, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 42 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 793 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,181 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 672 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 642 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 803 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 764 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 593 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 720 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,401 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,876 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,139 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 380 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59 | #2,372 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 93 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 72 | #2,085 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 81 | #1,889 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 75 | #1,941 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 79 | #1,889 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 73 | #1,997 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 95 | #1,665 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 87 | #1,765 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 105 | #1,548 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 119 | #1,417 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 151 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 144 | #1,228 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 135 | #1,273 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 151 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 180 | #1,053 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 189 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 158 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 192 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 213 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 196 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 219 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 192 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 166 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 171 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 164 | #913 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 150 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 183 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 140 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 148 | #907 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 140 | #928 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 148 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 118 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 104 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 106 | #1,029 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 84 | #1,155 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 93 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 75 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 69 | #1,138 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 67 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 54 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 66 | #1,096 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 72 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 68 | #1,102 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 72 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 55 | #1,247 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 51 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 80 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 57 | #1,130 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 58 | #1,103 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 45 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 62 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 51 | #1,141 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 69 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 65 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 71 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 61 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 71 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 72 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 75 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 75 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 79 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 91 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 82 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 87 | #818 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 93 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 82 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 81 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 74 | #868 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 77 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 81 | #801 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 95 | #735 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 74 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 80 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 66 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 71 | #814 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 75 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 77 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 77 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 54 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 48 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 67 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 58 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 51 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 64 | #773 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 53 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 55 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 61 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 70 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 70 | #733 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 42 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 61 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 79 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 88 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 93 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 88 | #659 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 102 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 118 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 113 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 113 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 144 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 123 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 122 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 142 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 116 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 116 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 111 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 113 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 114 | #537 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 111 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 78 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 61 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 58 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 23 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 9 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #899 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,391 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #902 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Domenic reached #517 in 1912. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Domenic
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.