Is Octavio a boy or girl name?
Octavio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 138 boys were named Octavio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 11,299 US babies named Octavio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,366
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Octavio since 1908
- 11,299
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 437 babies
Boys and girls named Octavio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 76 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 199 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 212 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 211 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 338 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 519 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,027 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,407 | 5 | 0.4% |
| 1990s | 2,153 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 2,870 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,610 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 666 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 138 | #1,366 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 140 | #1,354 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 139 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 117 | #1,523 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 132 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 117 | #1,474 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 128 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 144 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 148 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 186 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 192 | #1,044 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 176 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 158 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 144 | #1,216 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 217 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 222 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 245 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 243 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 341 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 321 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 313 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 437 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 264 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 225 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 259 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 250 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 193 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 198 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 261 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 219 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 185 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 205 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 212 | #707 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 215 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 215 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 168 | #765 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 144 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 165 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 129 | #802 | 5 | #12,250 |
| 1985 | 120 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 130 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 112 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 125 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 172 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 142 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 117 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 115 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 119 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 133 | #727 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 127 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 106 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 104 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 74 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 63 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 69 | #974 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 63 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 56 | #994 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 64 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 45 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 51 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 51 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 52 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 43 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 44 | #1,203 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 50 | #1,109 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 43 | #1,192 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 28 | #1,506 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 45 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 37 | #1,278 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 29 | #1,442 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 31 | #1,378 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 38 | #1,226 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 26 | #1,508 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 35 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 26 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 30 | #1,338 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 21 | #1,644 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,470 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 21 | #1,592 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 28 | #1,261 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 14 | #1,952 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 20 | #1,621 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 24 | #1,453 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 13 | #2,059 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 14 | #1,958 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,696 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 18 | #1,668 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 16 | #1,809 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 21 | #1,494 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 21 | #1,527 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 26 | #1,348 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 15 | #1,886 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 24 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 21 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 33 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 27 | #1,402 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 25 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 24 | #1,590 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 23 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,726 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 20 | #1,822 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 18 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 12 | #2,593 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 15 | #2,234 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 14 | #2,308 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 9 | #3,053 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 12 | #2,492 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 13 | #2,248 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,680 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #2,993 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 9 | #2,399 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 10 | #1,903 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,931 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 6 | #1,326 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Octavio reached #532 in 2003. As a girl name, it reached #12,250 in 1986. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Octavio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.