Is Macey a boy or girl name?
Macey is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 157 girls and 0 boys were named Macey, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.6% of the 11,457 US babies named Macey were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,418
- Babies named Macey since 1900
- 11,457
- Most popular year
- 2001
- 561 babies
Boys and girls named Macey, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 1910s | 18 | 30 | 62.5% |
| 1920s | 15 | 6 | 28.6% |
| 1930s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1960s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 227 | 100% |
| 1990s | 11 | 2,821 | 99.6% |
| 2000s | 7 | 4,820 | 99.9% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,657 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 672 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 157 | #1,418 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,650 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 123 | #1,700 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,837 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,405 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 161 | #1,398 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 168 | #1,342 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 201 | #1,205 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 212 | #1,180 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 248 | #1,066 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 291 | #928 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 277 | #921 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 322 | #833 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 374 | #738 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 403 | #710 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 413 | #704 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 478 | #646 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 453 | #656 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 453 | #636 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 536 | #540 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 458 | #606 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 495 | #560 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 455 | #575 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 561 | #494 |
| 2000 | 7 | #8,766 | 518 | #514 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 474 | #533 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 395 | #608 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 310 | #696 |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,949 | 284 | #744 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 279 | #737 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 251 | #806 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 246 | #814 |
| 1992 | 6 | #8,052 | 236 | #843 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,019 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,075 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,976 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,851 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,948 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,129 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,374 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,576 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,325 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,843 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,834 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,827 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,529 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,404 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,998 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,431 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,055 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,596 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,841 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,360 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,749 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,342 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,698 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,231 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,467 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,295 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,787 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,798 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,612 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,899 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 5 | #4,580 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 5 | #4,728 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,841 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,701 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,129 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,272 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 7 | #3,265 | 9 | #3,033 |
| 1914 | 6 | #3,123 | 6 | #3,454 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,250 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,254 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,721 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,104 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Macey reached #3,123 in 1914. As a girl name, it reached #494 in 2001. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Macey
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.