Is Lidia a boy or girl name?
Lidia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 146 girls and 0 boys were named Lidia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 11,193 US babies named Lidia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,488
- Babies named Lidia since 1888
- 11,193
- Most popular year
- 2008
- 243 babies
Boys and girls named Lidia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 28 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 145 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 429 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 518 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 563 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 708 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 830 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 969 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 1,097 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 1,690 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,977 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,561 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 644 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,488 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,743 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 130 | #1,632 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,678 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,646 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,644 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,673 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,548 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 151 | #1,509 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 154 | #1,490 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 158 | #1,443 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,448 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,403 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 182 | #1,296 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 200 | #1,211 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 204 | #1,224 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 243 | #1,077 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 210 | #1,201 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 215 | #1,141 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 193 | #1,190 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 199 | #1,148 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,268 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 185 | #1,127 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,125 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 175 | #1,155 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 157 | #1,213 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 175 | #1,102 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 153 | #1,191 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 176 | #1,053 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 178 | #1,025 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 186 | #998 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 168 | #1,083 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,070 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,017 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,178 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 141 | #1,167 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,361 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,254 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,237 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 122 | #1,169 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,317 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,197 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,283 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,279 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,255 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,320 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,268 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,411 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,146 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,170 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,207 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,114 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,095 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,217 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,114 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,179 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,217 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,112 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,166 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,021 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,303 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,231 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,339 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,312 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,175 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,199 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,183 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,231 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,247 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,365 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,120 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,086 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,212 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,272 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,047 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,043 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,262 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,199 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,157 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,071 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,075 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,119 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,016 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 55 | #990 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,017 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,057 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 59 | #926 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 75 | #794 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 56 | #918 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 61 | #887 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,226 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,034 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 52 | #983 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,115 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,067 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 57 | #956 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 63 | #942 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 61 | #979 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,088 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,013 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,457 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,654 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,326 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,648 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,784 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,628 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,397 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,455 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,914 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,814 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,862 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,447 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,672 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,238 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,574 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,926 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,823 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,842 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,736 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,724 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,371 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,550 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,213 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,219 |
Highest rank
Lidia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #794 in 1937. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lidia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.