Is Juliet a boy or girl name?
Juliet is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 1,116 girls and 0 boys were named Juliet, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 36,826 US babies named Juliet were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #283
- Babies named Juliet since 1880
- 36,826
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 1,402 babies
Boys and girls named Juliet, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 112 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 152 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 226 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 661 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 803 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 578 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 823 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,193 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,083 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 2,316 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 1,605 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 2,414 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 5,484 | 100% |
| 2010s | 5 | 13,002 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 5,369 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 1,116 | #283 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 1,063 | #292 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 1,075 | #293 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 1,078 | #295 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 1,037 | #306 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 1,231 | #269 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 1,347 | #243 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 1,380 | #228 |
| 2016 | 5 | #13,178 | 1,397 | #228 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 1,357 | #240 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 1,268 | #259 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 1,333 | #238 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 1,271 | #254 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 1,276 | #250 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 1,142 | #286 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 1,024 | #318 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 697 | #453 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 609 | #517 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 503 | #582 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 484 | #589 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 422 | #650 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 452 | #603 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 428 | #602 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 460 | #564 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 405 | #623 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 396 | #613 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 397 | #606 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 365 | #617 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 244 | #825 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 171 | #1,051 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 176 | #1,040 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,091 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 168 | #1,078 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 175 | #1,047 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,123 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 181 | #963 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,080 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 146 | #1,056 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,081 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 168 | #934 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 127 | #1,093 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 165 | #911 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 173 | #887 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 179 | #868 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 181 | #854 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 178 | #869 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 154 | #922 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 140 | #981 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 159 | #858 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 218 | #687 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 203 | #715 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 245 | #624 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 256 | #615 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 370 | #508 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 393 | #505 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 291 | #581 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 182 | #728 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 185 | #722 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 193 | #707 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 205 | #687 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 200 | #736 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 215 | #690 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 244 | #649 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 196 | #744 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 172 | #779 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 153 | #830 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 131 | #896 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 154 | #818 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 124 | #899 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 122 | #880 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 126 | #839 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 103 | #932 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 93 | #977 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 93 | #964 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 94 | #920 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 90 | #938 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 81 | #969 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 80 | #987 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 91 | #869 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 64 | #971 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 89 | #809 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 82 | #863 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 78 | #879 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 88 | #769 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 80 | #790 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 69 | #841 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 84 | #758 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 73 | #805 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,073 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 53 | #957 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,156 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,032 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 63 | #887 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 59 | #904 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,046 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 66 | #884 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 67 | #899 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 68 | #908 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 88 | #771 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 76 | #856 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 92 | #779 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 90 | #770 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 78 | #832 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 83 | #804 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 95 | #744 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 81 | #785 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 100 | #721 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 85 | #754 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 99 | #688 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 66 | #810 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 74 | #678 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 49 | #754 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 42 | #773 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 41 | #681 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 24 | #884 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 30 | #738 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 30 | #719 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 34 | #642 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 24 | #749 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 16 | #950 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 21 | #791 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 15 | #912 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 23 | #727 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 17 | #810 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 16 | #954 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 17 | #802 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 15 | #901 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 19 | #730 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 22 | #674 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 20 | #711 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 16 | #766 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 11 | #927 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 11 | #936 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,270 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 15 | #706 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,075 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 12 | #770 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 11 | #715 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 24 | #442 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 9 | #775 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 13 | #601 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 10 | #631 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #775 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 9 | #604 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 10 | #563 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Juliet reached #13,178 in 2016. As a girl name, it reached #228 in 2016. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Juliet
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.