Is Julio a boy or girl name?
Julio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 475 boys were named Julio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 63,756 US babies named Julio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #598
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Julio since 1888
- 63,756
- Most popular year
- 1990
- 1,563 babies
Boys and girls named Julio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 75 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 563 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,317 | 30 | 2.2% |
| 1930s | 1,111 | 5 | 0.4% |
| 1940s | 1,292 | 5 | 0.4% |
| 1950s | 2,566 | 19 | 0.7% |
| 1960s | 4,052 | 24 | 0.6% |
| 1970s | 7,051 | 92 | 1.3% |
| 1980s | 9,329 | 124 | 1.3% |
| 1990s | 13,839 | 100 | 0.7% |
| 2000s | 12,778 | 23 | 0.2% |
| 2010s | 6,846 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,504 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 475 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 511 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 538 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 458 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 522 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 539 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 541 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 581 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 626 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 664 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 655 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 717 | #412 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 776 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 819 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 928 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,061 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,200 | #284 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 1,306 | #266 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,415 | #240 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 1,517 | #227 | 6 | #15,385 |
| 2004 | 1,222 | #268 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 1,158 | #271 | 6 | #14,720 |
| 2002 | 1,273 | #255 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 1,320 | #254 | 5 | #16,551 |
| 2000 | 1,306 | #256 | 6 | #13,975 |
| 1999 | 1,244 | #252 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 1,192 | #250 | 5 | #15,231 |
| 1997 | 1,288 | #238 | 9 | #9,381 |
| 1996 | 1,450 | #213 | 11 | #7,826 |
| 1995 | 1,284 | #233 | 11 | #7,761 |
| 1994 | 1,316 | #220 | 8 | #9,976 |
| 1993 | 1,455 | #206 | 12 | #7,229 |
| 1992 | 1,542 | #201 | 18 | #5,369 |
| 1991 | 1,513 | #204 | 18 | #5,275 |
| 1990 | 1,555 | #194 | 8 | #9,655 |
| 1989 | 1,186 | #229 | 16 | #5,402 |
| 1988 | 1,024 | #236 | 16 | #5,153 |
| 1987 | 1,008 | #232 | 9 | #7,645 |
| 1986 | 995 | #234 | 10 | #6,816 |
| 1985 | 887 | #256 | 13 | #5,492 |
| 1984 | 948 | #235 | 18 | #4,231 |
| 1983 | 768 | #271 | 14 | #4,985 |
| 1982 | 830 | #263 | 12 | #5,694 |
| 1981 | 887 | #249 | 5 | #11,115 |
| 1980 | 796 | #270 | 11 | #6,079 |
| 1979 | 825 | #257 | 13 | #5,224 |
| 1978 | 743 | #265 | 12 | #5,334 |
| 1977 | 718 | #272 | 9 | #6,553 |
| 1976 | 760 | #258 | 6 | #8,582 |
| 1975 | 763 | #259 | 11 | #5,296 |
| 1974 | 728 | #264 | 7 | #7,202 |
| 1973 | 651 | #283 | 7 | #6,976 |
| 1972 | 614 | #302 | 8 | #6,210 |
| 1971 | 605 | #311 | 8 | #6,268 |
| 1970 | 644 | #307 | 11 | #4,885 |
| 1969 | 578 | #322 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 466 | #359 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 466 | #346 | 6 | #6,359 |
| 1966 | 351 | #404 | 5 | #7,029 |
| 1965 | 376 | #406 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 391 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 406 | #400 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 335 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 339 | #434 | 6 | #6,166 |
| 1960 | 344 | #434 | 7 | #5,409 |
| 1959 | 294 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 301 | #453 | 6 | #5,730 |
| 1957 | 298 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 282 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 259 | #461 | 6 | #5,498 |
| 1954 | 249 | #460 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 255 | #449 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 245 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 190 | #492 | 7 | #4,589 |
| 1950 | 193 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 176 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 179 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 135 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 135 | #549 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 140 | #504 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 94 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 125 | #569 | 5 | #5,007 |
| 1942 | 100 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 94 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 114 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 88 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 97 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 118 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 84 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 101 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 108 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 101 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 125 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 131 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 158 | #471 | 5 | #4,894 |
| 1929 | 145 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 134 | #522 | 6 | #4,448 |
| 1927 | 148 | #499 | 8 | #3,716 |
| 1926 | 133 | #524 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 140 | #519 | 5 | #5,384 |
| 1924 | 146 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 135 | #523 | 11 | #3,018 |
| 1922 | 120 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 118 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 98 | #638 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 100 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 88 | #661 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 78 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 75 | #688 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 69 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 46 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 46 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 24 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 24 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 13 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 17 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 15 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 7 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 9 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #879 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 7 | #1,022 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 11 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 6 | #988 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Julio reached #194 in 1990. As a girl name, it reached #3,018 in 1923. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Julio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.